States have the right to document children and it is a test of the 14th amendment. This law will go to the Supreme Court.
2007-12-14 06:34:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Censor me if you think it is hate speech You libs don't have a problem hitting the report button
2007-12-14 06:48:32 · update #1
yes
as for the term anchor babies what's with all the whines..the term accurately describes the intent behind running across the border ,getting free maternity care/delivery all to circumvent standard immigration application procedures..
I hope the supreme court rules favorably since the fed government has failed to fund the states who must care for the illegals and their infant of opportunity...Human life should not be reduced to a "barter tool" or payment for an adults desire....too many kids are exploited in this world already..
2007-12-14 07:17:55 · answer #1 · answered by cyansure 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Riley Alexa Christopher John Vivian Mae James Hunter Brooke Daisey
2016-05-23 23:15:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I support Arizona and it's desire to put the idiotic idea that the 14th covers anchor babies. I can't wait to see it tested in the Court and the whole idea thrown out and ALL states will be forbidden from issuing certificates to anchors. I hope the court makes it retroactive so any anchor with a certificate is now a criminal.
2007-12-14 06:58:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I disaprove of the term Anchor baby and any law that would deny a birth certificate to somebody born in the U.S.
If you are a child born in the United States, then you are a citizen no questions asked. Your parents, if they are illegal, are still illegal and subject to the law.
Anchor babies are used as an excuse by illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. so that they can raise their child here. It is a good excuse, but the child will always be a U.S. citizen regardless of where they are raised. Therefore, if the parents are deported under the law, they can choose to take their child with them (who will still be a citizen) or to let the child be adopted. Of course, they would be allowed to immigrate legally following the proper channels as usual.
2007-12-14 06:46:54 · answer #4 · answered by Christopher F 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
YES>Call it like it is>anchor babys used as human shields>Make it nation wide and revoke the 1s before if illegal<
2007-12-14 07:05:49 · answer #5 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I support this, there is no rational interpretation of the 14th ammendment that grants automatic citizenship to a child born here of illegal immigrants.
2007-12-14 07:58:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, first the term 'anchor babies' is considered by many people to be hate speech.
This term refers to children born in the United States by undocumented (illegal) immigrants.
By most accountings of Federal law, anyone born in the United States is a Citizen of the United States. It is ALSO the States right (and duty) to provide birth certification for its residents.
So the State of Arizona feels that it is above the law? Not a good idea.
I do not support this law meant to place the cause of the problems we have in the United States on immigrants.
2007-12-14 06:43:13 · answer #7 · answered by Sissy Bee 1 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Yes.
2007-12-14 08:13:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds like a good idea but I guaranty you is unconstitutional / in conflict with federal law.
Vote Ron Paul & join the rEVOLution.
2007-12-14 06:53:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Finally...I am all for it..Loser pays court cost....
2007-12-14 06:42:56 · answer #10 · answered by Raymond C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋