2007-12-14 06:28:03 · 14 answers · asked by Steven R 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Rock and Pop
Well of coarse this is up for debate because of many factors. The Beatles help develope alot of our culture and gave us some of the greatest songs that will live forever. Roy Orbison gave us a part of his soul that we can relate to personaly at times. Listen to Mystery Girl album and you hopefully will hear what I mean. He was great.
2007-12-14 09:51:24 · answer #1 · answered by Mike S 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh, my. Must we go through this again? Bottom line: Rarely ANYONE is better than The Beatles.
And Roy Orbison isn't even in the same genre as The Fab Four.
Duh.
2007-12-14 14:32:44 · answer #2 · answered by Michelle Ma Belle 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't say he was a better artist but he was superior to The Beatles in that he had a better singing voice and could play guitar better than any of them.
2007-12-14 15:28:38 · answer #3 · answered by RoVale 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He could sing a ballad better than any beatle and he could sing a R&R song better than any beatle
2007-12-14 16:44:12 · answer #4 · answered by keeprockin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
nope--there are no reasons. The Beatles are awesome and always will be.
2007-12-14 14:44:47 · answer #5 · answered by dinny's engaged!! 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'll answer this as soon as I finish comparing apples and oranges.
2007-12-14 14:36:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
hmmm..lets be realistic nobody and i mean nobody is better than the beatles..its not humanly possible...
2007-12-14 14:36:42 · answer #7 · answered by kris k 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who says he is?
2007-12-14 14:31:20 · answer #8 · answered by murphs 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The black hair and huge shades...definitely cool.
2007-12-14 14:37:16 · answer #9 · answered by Mizz SJG 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Short answer: he ain't
2007-12-14 14:30:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋