2007-12-14 06:27:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
my source? the AP, Rueters, CNN, FOX, BBC. Google it baby!
2007-12-14 06:33:08 · update #1
btw, i dont need a source to ask a question. if i had a source for the question i would need an answer. get a clue darling.
2007-12-14 06:33:48 · update #2
Bush doesnt own an oil company and when he did he it lost money and failed at it. again use google.
2007-12-14 06:34:31 · update #3
DSTR your answer is invalid because you support shooting conservatives at the ballot box
2007-12-14 06:35:22 · update #4
What do conservatives thinking about your daddy, Rupert Murdoch contributing $$$$$$ to Hillary's campaign?
2007-12-14 06:31:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Source?
I doubt seriously Hugo Chavez would endorse Hillary Clinton. Hillary embraces neo-liberalism which establishes governing institutions that do will away with laws that present barriers to exploitation and profit. When resources are consumed or otherwise disappear, then neo-liberalism places maximum priority in finding other resources. Acquiring new natural resources is often, difficult. If need be, neo-liberalism will take what it needs. While exploitation of resources, including human beings, is not new, the extent of its worldwide scope is now unprecedented. Once a commodity, whatever it is, be it a depleted uranium shell, television set, or a meal, is sold, nothing else matters except the sale of the next depleted uranium shell, TV or meal. This is the case even if the shell causes death and destruction or the meal is not nutritious. Globalization is about dominating the globe's natural resources with few or no barriers. Neo-liberalism is about dominating everything so that the quest for capital becomes the universal human value. Human beings either acquiesce or perish.
2007-12-14 14:30:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
You forgot one, the Iranian terrorist president. He loves the idea of a weakling as a president like Hillary.
2007-12-14 15:02:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably the same thing they thought when Osama endorsed the Democrat party.
2007-12-14 14:46:21 · answer #4 · answered by Darth Scorn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it not endorsing Clinton, just anyone with a brain cant stand bush and his cronies. the endorse a door knob over a current repub, anyone with a brain would.
2007-12-14 14:42:09 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. Mallikarjun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They turn a blind eye...
half naked girl above me: do you have a brain? "the endorse a door knob over a current repub" I guess I must need your IQ to decipher this comment!
2007-12-14 14:45:09 · answer #6 · answered by nothing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF it's true it just shows they are all smarter and better judges of character than repKon fascists.
2007-12-14 14:38:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they do.They are too smart and probably see her only as a lesser evil
2007-12-14 14:41:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF it is true then it's a case of reverse psychology. Also, IF it is true then it's apparently working.
2007-12-14 14:36:11 · answer #9 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals love dictators.
2007-12-14 14:31:19 · answer #10 · answered by Bob 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋