2007-12-14 05:56:11 · 11 answers · asked by Steven R 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Rock and Pop
He had a beautiful voice. Not one Beatle did. Unique, yes, but not really, really good.
2007-12-14 06:03:25 · answer #1 · answered by Little Red Hen 2.0 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I can only think of 1 & it's nothing against the Beatles, because I do like them better...
The Fans.... None of the Beatle Fans today ask for a John Lennon or George Harrison Day, However the Elvis fans even today consistently push year after year to make it a National Holiday.
Not too many Paul McCartney impersonaters, simply cause he had a very unique voice, whereas any Hillbilly can do Elvis's voice, so I gotta disagree with the lady above
2007-12-14 14:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by orangecat 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Who said he was better than the Beatles? The Beatles wrote the majority of their own music...Elvis sang other people's music. Other than the fact that they banned his swiveling hips on tv and that seemed to make him even more popular [in his time], Elvis did nothing to impress me. He couldn't even act well. His best music was the gospel music that he sang. The Beatles excelled at everything they did. Including playing instruments, singing, song-writing, and acting. I still enjoy their music today.
2007-12-14 14:05:42 · answer #3 · answered by trivia buff 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
All who say Elvis is better than John, Paul, George and The Starr should be forced onto an island together because there is no room for their irrationalism here.
: )
2007-12-14 14:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by Michelle Ma Belle 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No. Because Beatles is better than him. Sorry. Just telling the truth.
2007-12-14 14:06:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
He was an entertainer and the first. That's why he was and always will be the KING!
2007-12-14 21:00:56 · answer #6 · answered by Lizzy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is all very new to me. Taste differs on here. I'm going to stop typing now.
2007-12-14 14:21:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
there are no reasons
2007-12-14 15:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by Bullet 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
1.hes fat
2.hes not
3.the beatles actually have meaning to their songs...
i mean, he was supposedly
"the king of rock"
which everyone knows isn't exactly true....
:)
2007-12-14 14:03:51 · answer #9 · answered by chaps'n'love 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
There is none because he wasn't
2007-12-14 14:08:02 · answer #10 · answered by Beatle fanatic 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋