es on there.How many agree?
2007-12-14 05:20:24 · 9 answers · asked by ssanderson2006 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
That Obama shouldn't be president? Yeah. Not the other part though.
2007-12-14 05:26:25 · answer #1 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
That's absurd. Some of our best Presidents never even had a sniff of the White House before (e.g. Washington, Lincoln, Jackson, Eisenhower). The characteristic necessary is leadership. Does someone have the courage to lead even in the face of popular disapproval? It may be necessary if the person believes they are right.
The worst Presidents are those who believe that the office is somehow the next step in their "career" and that they are somehow "owed" the office due to their previous service.
2007-12-14 05:36:53 · answer #2 · answered by Matt W 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
So Hillary is the only candidate you consider viable? Or do you mean someone that has visited the white house? Or are you suggesting a former president should come back? Just what the hell are you saying?
2007-12-14 05:32:47 · answer #3 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Unfiortunately, President Bush is not eligble for a third term.
Oh? You meant Hilarious. Well, she was in the White House, it's true, but as to knowing what was going on there, I imagine had she known what her husband was up to at the White House with Monica she would have interceded. Then again, perhaps not.
2007-12-14 05:28:23 · answer #4 · answered by anonymourati 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Probably not too many. Most of us know that she is a thief and a liar and want no part of her getting back in there to steal what she couldn't carry the first trip. I don't WANT to be a socialist!
If she was so in the know how did Monica get a lip lock on her husband so many times?
2007-12-14 06:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So only sitting pPresidents, Vice Presidents and First Ladies are qualified to run for President?
2007-12-14 05:28:05 · answer #6 · answered by Fred S - AM Cappo Di Tutti Capi 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
bush assembled the most espereinced team ever in the white house with Rumsfeld and Cheney going all the way back to the Nixon administration
look what that got us
its obvious from Barak's ability to stay even with Hillary in fundraising and now beating her in more and more polls that he knows how to pick the right people for the job and knows how to direct them
thats something bush never did
Rudi has the same problem too
even Hillary cant seem to pick the right people as seen yesterday by her NH campaign manager having to resign in disgrace
Obama '08
2007-12-14 05:25:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Totally disagree, especially if you are talking about Mrs. Clinton...her presidency would be even more divisive than Bush's...we need a uniter, not a divider.
Obama '08
2007-12-14 05:26:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
So what does that mean? You're voting for Hillary to re-elect Bill?
2007-12-14 05:27:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋