English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) Bill Clinton lobbing a handful of Tomahawks at a spot in the desert where Osama was thought to be?

2) George Bush sending thousands of troops in, taking over the country, and chasing Bin Laden into the mountains?

2007-12-14 05:09:50 · 9 answers · asked by thegubmint 7 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

I would have to say option 2- sir.

2007-12-14 05:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 2 3

Clinton--he tried to attack bin Laden based on the intelligence he had. Reports said bin Laden escaped by a few hours.

If Clinton had actually sent troops into Afghanistan, the Right Wing nuts would have screamed he was trying to take focus off the impeachment circus.

After 9/11, Bush sent fewer troops into Afghanistan than there are cops in New York City. This man just committed one of the greatest mass murders in American History, and Bush sends a handful of troops in (while holding back the majority of forces to send to Iraq).

He also had US commanders "oversee" the action while Afghanistan locals handled most of the fighting at Tora Bora, and it was probably one of those locals that allowed bin Laden to escape.

2007-12-14 06:17:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Taking over what country? Is bin Laden an Iraqi? NO. We sent thousands of troops in not to get bin Laden, but to line the pockets of the war profiteers. Nobody will get bin Laden because no one wants to. As long as you are all scared of him, Shrub and gang can go right along shredding the Constitution.

2007-12-14 05:45:59 · answer #3 · answered by Chris S 4 · 1 0

Bill Clinton by far

George Bu$h family is like to Osama and the rest of the Bin Laden Family

The Bu$h love of money ,means we always just close enough to scare the uneducated red staters

Bin Ladin is not worry, he knows the Bu$h family is in the pocket, and one thing a Bu$h never does is mess with the flow of money to them

2007-12-14 06:14:03 · answer #4 · answered by EnberWolfe 3 · 1 0

I was OK with the Cruise missiles. But remember Newt blocked their use. If it wasn't for zippergate more could have been done.

One of my favorite twists to the Sudan attacks was the aspirin factory story. It was reported in the press that the alleged weapons facility was an aspirin factory. You could see clearly in the photos they had several rows of Bio Fermenters. As all of you know bio-fermenters are not used in the making of Aspirin. But they are used in anthrax or small pox production.

I am glad the production of weapons grade biological materials was stopped.

2007-12-14 05:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 1 0

bush could get saddam in a spider hole, but he cant get bin laden, after spending 1.6 t so far, the war on terror is a joke, a myth.

2007-12-14 05:25:27 · answer #6 · answered by smarternow 4 · 2 0

2 is all out balls to the wall. However, more could be done.

2007-12-14 05:17:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I agree with that guy

2007-12-14 05:14:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

1

bush just let usama escape at tora bora.

2007-12-14 05:13:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers