2007-12-14 04:39:38 · 5 answers · asked by Athisayan 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Both are superstitions and neither has anymore authority than astrology or reading tea leaves, entrails....
2007-12-14 05:07:02 · answer #1 · answered by DonnieB 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
sure and a few of it used to be precise and others bit had been crap like he mentioned my gran used to be there and to mention i had to develop up and stuff however my grans now not useless but most effective my grandads lol. and that my bf is my sole mate and we are living comfortable in combination for each and every which i'm hoping is right been in combination four 12 months so it need to be :-) and am going to go my using scan in a couple of month however i would already force lol. i laughed at him whilst he mentioned that. additionally he mentioned i used to be going to have five children :-( i dont desire any particularly good enough probably one boy thats it now not five.
2016-09-05 15:29:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both equally effective methods of bullshit.
How dare you post this blather in a science section.
2007-12-14 04:46:11 · answer #3 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I prefer to read the spots on a unicorns liver. It is more accurate than the methods you inquired about...
2007-12-14 04:43:56 · answer #4 · answered by Benjamin Goodman 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Effective for what? Parting the gullible and their money?
2007-12-14 08:46:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋