I think he should. There is no evidence stating he is juiced. Him and Bonds Hall Of Famers!
2007-12-14 03:42:34 · 12 answers · asked by RONTJ 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
I agree. There is no concrete evidence... Plus this is the steroid era... We can't say for SURE who used roids and who was clean... We have to look at it as an era and either let everyone in (based on numbers) or let no one in.
2007-12-14 03:46:19 · answer #1 · answered by Reduviidae 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In the history of baseball, anyone that ever got caught cheating has been banned from the game for life. This includes the Hall of Fame.
None of the players named in the Mitchell Report should be inducted and they should have their records stripped. There are only a very few on the list that are even considered superstars, anyway.
All of the Melon Head (Bonds) supporters and Yankee fans are going to disagree, but those that have put up enough numbers to be considered, and cheated doing it, should not be allowed into the Hall of Fame unless they purchase a ticket.
2007-12-14 04:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think of the adult men like McGwire, Bonds and Clemens ought to get interior the hall of attractiveness. before everything, as we've considered, numerous different adult men took steroids on the comparable time. possibly no longer hall of Famers yet much. purely 2 adult men produced over 80 names!!! Secondly, there became into no rule banning it. MLB needed those adult men to be triumphant so there became into no reason to start up attempting out. McGwire and Sosa helped resurrect baseball with their steroid-precipitated homers. Is steroids against the regulation? confident, yet so is taking different annoying center drugs and we now there are hall of Famers in already who fall into this class. and that i do no longer desire to pay attention approximately how steroids superior their overall performance because of the fact even coacaine can do this because of the fact it ought to offer a guy a psychological part and smoking marijuana would have made a hall of Famer extra laid back and comfortable on the plate. And particularly, i do no longer particularly desire to pay attention what they'd desire to declare. I advise Bonds has been denying it for years now and no one believes him. human beings will believe what they desire regardless of what the athlete says.
2016-11-03 06:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he should be allowed into the hall of fame. On top of that they should take away 2 of his cy youngs because of the 3 years he reportedly took steroids he won 2 cy youngs put up around 19 wins, around 3 era and about 240 k's, But if the hall of fame voters can take those 3 years from his stats and still think he deserves to be in it then i guess they should put him in.
2007-12-14 03:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No he should not be enshrined. Nice that he has his lawyer make a statement of denial after the Mitchell report is released seeing as he was invited to state his case during the investigation and refused. What does that say??
2007-12-14 03:51:30 · answer #5 · answered by alomew_rocks 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
baseball stinks and he is a major stinker. the hall of fame has become an obsolete junk shop.
2007-12-14 03:55:24 · answer #6 · answered by Winnie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No evidence except somebody else said he did it. Anyone can say anything at any time. Unless there is some real evidence, you have to act as though it is untrue.
2007-12-14 04:30:25 · answer #7 · answered by Rich 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wake up and smell the coffee!
He cheated and shouldn't get in.
2007-12-14 03:47:38 · answer #8 · answered by the_meadowlander 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. My only question is, IS his son also juicing?
2007-12-14 04:08:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, he should not. He is a cheater and should not be rewarded for cheating.
2007-12-14 03:57:10 · answer #10 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋