English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

......can we expect the same stunning improvements that we have seen since the War on Poverty and the War on Drugs were enacted?

2007-12-14 03:16:46 · 12 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Dart Swinger: Yes, it is a waste of resources if the programs have no efffect.
Hence, my question.

2007-12-14 03:28:11 · update #1

12 answers

Well that same arrogance they put into with the other "wars" will fall flat when all the programs don't stop the earth from going through the same dang cycle it always has. I don't know if their egos can handle the truth lol...

2007-12-14 03:23:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Supposedly if we pass som rediculous legislation regulating our gas mileage how long will it take before it goes into effect? 10? 20 years? then of course there will be loophole after loophole for all the politicians friends. Lol. Global warming is fiction not fact. I'll say what I've said before: If a meteorologist cannot accurately predict weather beyond a few days, how can these wanna be scientists predict climate change in 50-100 years? NO LOGICAL EXPLANATIONS. One more thing: Of all the global warming "experts" none are scientists. FICTION PEOPLE.

2007-12-14 03:33:52 · answer #2 · answered by Your #1 fan 6 · 3 0

Whenever our Government get involved with anything it is all about the $$$$$$. This is another excuse for them to come up with new programs they think will justify diverting our tax dollar to another stupid program that will line the pockets of some of their cronies.

The Government never use to believe anything about Global Warming and now they are trying to convince the voters they really do. Wake up America, please!

2007-12-14 03:38:06 · answer #3 · answered by From Yours Trully 4 · 4 0

Probably. The liberals' slogan "if it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is," is a completely backwards way of thinking. These people shouldn't be in charge of taking orders at Burger King drive-thrus, much less making legislation that affects the nation.

2007-12-14 03:29:31 · answer #4 · answered by Indie.Expressionist 2 · 4 0

No, Environmentalists have a lot more resolve in general, and will make sure people actually follow the policies.

2007-12-14 03:47:18 · answer #5 · answered by pip 7 · 0 0

I see your point. The government and our tax dollars should not be involved in curtailing poverty, drugs, or global warming. A waste of resources, right?

2007-12-14 03:20:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

We will see that billions of dollars were wasted,economic growth was stifled and the globe just kept getting warmer. You can't fight Mother Nature!

2007-12-14 03:22:18 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff F 3 · 4 2

When the North and South Poles stop melting.

2007-12-14 03:21:32 · answer #8 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 2 3

hehe...no. This one is the best yet. It is a "Global problem" so it will be significantly more stunning on a global scale.

2007-12-14 03:20:23 · answer #9 · answered by osisdorsey 4 · 3 3

global warming is just so much hype. Liquid hot magma is causing polar melt. Look it up. Al Gore needs to be stripped of his medal.

2007-12-14 03:19:32 · answer #10 · answered by Hoptoad City 4 · 7 4

fedest.com, questions and answers