English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And, since that's the theory which explains parallel universes so well...does e=Mc2 now mean...energy = membranes x the speed of Light squared?

2007-12-14 03:00:03 · 8 answers · asked by Elysabeth 7 in Science & Mathematics Physics

8 answers

"The only thing that does not change is man's inability to notice change."
Albert Einstein

2007-12-14 14:08:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

11 dimensional string theory, (and 26 dimensional M theory), has not produced anything.

It is possible that the extra 7 dimensions of space in string theory, (that are not perceived), are mathematical deception that first appeared with 5 dimensional Kaluza-Klein Theory.

String theory is possibly deception involving adding dimensions of space to the already existing 3 dimensions of space one dimension at a time at 90 degree angles to the previous dimension.

That string theory is possibly invalid is stated at the end of the wikipedia article on string theory.

2007-12-15 11:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

M theory is just one more untestable bundle of bones like string theory. Physicists hate to admit that they don't know so they invent great skyscrapers of mathematics that they then present as answers that can only be understood by the high priests of imaginary numbers. A theory of everything must be simple and self evident as well as able to conjure a universe out of nothing.

2007-12-14 13:21:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No, you're way off. Or just being a goober.
M Theory is a theory that organizes various forms of String Theory, which unifies (or attempts to) Relativity and the Standard Model (atomic physics and quantum physics).
The "m" in e=mc^2 is "mass".

2007-12-14 11:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by guyster 6 · 0 0

When you find out, I also would like to know. My knowledge in this area of science is VERY limited.

2007-12-14 19:32:58 · answer #5 · answered by lynnemarton13 2 · 1 0

I'll have Stephen Hawking explain it to you--and to me!

2007-12-14 11:20:55 · answer #6 · answered by Elaine P...is for Poetry 7 · 2 0

this q is beyond what i always i expect you to ask...i wish u GOOD LUCK u must get the answer

2007-12-15 07:26:26 · answer #7 · answered by jahaan 2 · 1 0

I don't have a clue on this one.

2007-12-14 18:19:30 · answer #8 · answered by glamour04111 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers