Yes, if its done before the Constitution is ratified of course. Once the Constitution comes into force though, Cameron will no longer be able to change our government.They would be caretakers,nothing more,exactly the same government to which Gordon Brown will have belonged.The next election will change nothing,it will be just an electorally mandated reshuffle. The faces may be different, but the government and its policies will continue unchanged.
Under those circumstances,sadly, I will simply refuse to vote for any Party unless or until it commits to withdrawing us from the EU and restoring our nation to its rightful owners... the people. If enough people do not care about that, though, and continue to vote the monkeys into power, then we, as a collective, only have ourselves to blame...
2007-12-14 08:36:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
he's busily engaged in a PR workout on the 2nd attempting to tell the regularly occurring public this could be a various social gathering than the single they elected for each style of reasons. He has promised to pay attention, yet we've already had the 'great verbal substitute' and considered how we've been skipped over while signing downing street petitions objecting to street pricing. He has defined plans to 'stress' nearby councils to 'pay attention' to petitions from nearby human beings yet yet he has made it sparkling that no referendum would be held on the hot shape disguised as yet another 'treaty'. It became into the comparable while the North east voted against a nearby assembly, they nonetheless have one. the clarification is easy those subjects are already desperate in Brussels/Strasbourg till now all people even in Westminster has enter no longer to point the electorate. we are to no longer be depended on with something as significant because of the fact the way forward for our very own united states of america in case we exhibit an autonomous view somewhat than vote for the political elite's propaganda led time table.
2016-11-03 06:07:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would want to know the exact wording of any question and I would want to know that there would be a lot of time set aside in the HoC to allow a full and proper debate that went over the history and exposed the deceits of the spin on the EU (or common market as was) so that the people now voting who weren't even born then understand just exactly how much the older generations were misled.
2007-12-14 04:13:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by noeusuperstate 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The thing is they have not, as far as I know they say ''The Dictator should keep his promise but they have no intention of giving a referendum as they themselves have made no such promise''. Cameron is a control freak and the Conservative party have got themselves a copy cat Tony Blair.
ATB Red
Hi Space welcome to reality.
Hi Space
2007-12-15 00:51:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Redmonk 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. I'm not particularly bothered about further integration with Europe as long as the Scottish Parliament gains increased devolved powers.
As far as Scotland is concerned, what is the difference between rule from London and rule from Brussels? Not much I reckon.
Hi Red - at last you've said something I can agree with ;-)
2007-12-14 03:05:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Spacephantom 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
interesting one. i would vote for them if this was the case. unfortunately it isn't going to happen, the only vote available now is one to leave the EU. and i would certainly turn up for that one no matter who put it forward.
2007-12-15 08:47:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by bruce m 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd be tempted but I don't think they would do that as I reckon David Cameron is an EU trojan horse.
2007-12-14 03:12:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes!
2007-12-14 03:16:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. You believe election promises?
2007-12-14 02:59:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maz T 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
I'd want to know who the stonemason was.
2007-12-14 02:59:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋