English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Hell no... $1mill wouldn't even cover the pain and suffering associated with getting the tats... And then I have to go outside like that??? I would surely disappoint my angel with such a disturbing site. All that aside, imagine how much it would hurt to have your nards tattooed. OUCH!!!!!!!!

2007-12-14 14:51:31 · answer #1 · answered by Magic Mouse 6 · 0 0

No but if the sum is $3M, YES INDEED! But with my free choice of the tattoos and enough time to go to the end of the process. And I don't want tattoo on my nose!

2015-07-03 21:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by pat de fr 2 · 0 0

Body graffiti for $1 M? No thank Q.

2007-12-14 02:59:23 · answer #3 · answered by Brewspy 4 · 0 0

have you ever had to chance to read the novel ,the illustrated
man he was tattooed from from head to toe ,but he did have
one spot on his body that did not have a tatoo and that was to be saved for a speical tatoo of death .but i can think of
other things to do with 100,000,000 dollars.

2007-12-14 04:00:28 · answer #4 · answered by atlantismeditation@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0 0

i love tattoos a whole lot, but even i know where to draw a line. i would run out of that money before i would get used to having my face tattooed. so proly not.

2007-12-14 02:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by Neev 7 · 0 0

never - I would never be able to leave the house again or look in a mirror, what good would the money be to me then?

2007-12-14 02:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Absolutely...I love getting inked!

2007-12-14 02:57:17 · answer #7 · answered by MetalMama 4 · 0 0

No Way

2007-12-14 07:38:10 · answer #8 · answered by Grand pa 7 · 0 0

No.
Tattoo's=STDs.

2007-12-14 03:58:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

where do I sign?

2007-12-14 03:35:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers