I think they may have. Everytime I think of the name Ron Paul, I think of Ron Paul spam, and Ron Paul obnoxious cut and pasting. Who else agrees with me?
If the Ron Paul cancer didn't spread his name in such a manner, I think more people would be turned on to him rather than turned off.
Over exposure kills everybody.
2007-12-14 02:36:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
jsk - that's right.
2007-12-14 02:51:05 · update #1
It simply disproves the old saying that all publicity is good publicity, or however the saying goes.
Ron Paul has no chance!
Thumbs down, please!
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-14 03:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by Rick K 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
properly, ya understand, a pollis a poll. between the failings it measures is who's certainly dedicated to vote. If people who're for the different applicants do no longer make the worry to vote interior the poll, and Ron Pauls supporters do, would not that advise that once election day comes, those people who did no longer take a seat and click a mouse some circumstances will never be dashing to the polls till now or after artwork to vote? i'm no longer a extensive fan of Ron Paul, yet possibly a minor fan, and of the Republican container, he easily has the final concepts. permit's see what occurs interior the primaries. If he gets the nomination, i'd would desire to alter my Democratic techniques ;-)
2016-11-03 06:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree, we're not electing a candidate's supporters we're electing the candidate himself/herself.. it really depends on where he/she stands on the issues.
Some of them are a bit obnoxious/immature, but I don't think their behavior "ruined" it for Paul. At this point the only candidates I see worth voting for are Biden and Paul, not because of who backs them, but because they actually have effective ways of dealing with issues this country is facing.
2007-12-14 05:00:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
His ideas are pretty good, and I decided to learn more about him after hearing his name by word of mouth.
However, While I'm sure some of his campaigners are a little overzealous, I wonder how many over-the-top of them are planted by the competition?
I'm sure, not *all* of them are fake, he has a good message and some people want to spread it by means that can annoy others... but that sure does sound like a platform to remove your opponent by. "We can stop him from getting media coverage, but his supporters are doing too well in promoting him. Let's make people think his supporters are idiots." "The masses will ignore the prophet if they think his followers are cultists."
2007-12-14 04:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by itsaGuy 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is a small number of supporters that go to the extreme out there, and i appreciate their enthusiasm, but some times there are different ways to handle situations to not come off as a crazy person. But i also dont think, with they way his popularity is growing, that anybody could do something to hurt his campaign. RON PAUL 2008
2007-12-14 02:45:45 · answer #5 · answered by JOSH 2 · 6⤊ 6⤋
It does not make any difference. His running was wasted and useless because the party will never nomi nate him.
2007-12-14 06:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well the media is basically ignoring him... like they always do with 3rd party candidates. The only third party candidate that has ever been invited to a debate is Perot.
I get what you're saying though... Ron Paul doesn't turn me off....it's the fanatics that are scouring the internet and harrasing people that turn me off. His policies on the issues are more in line with my thoughts, than Rudy or Hillary....
It's a shame that America isn't ready for real change yet...
A third party candidate is exactly what is needed....but the third party candidate has alot working against them. Both Dems and Reps, have stacked the election processes to keep any third party from ever getting close to the white house doorstep.
2007-12-14 02:44:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 9⤋
Bullcrap, you just don't like Ron Paul and your trying to silence his supporters
Ron Paul is the most under exposed candidate. The media barely ever talks about him.
2007-12-14 02:55:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
I think you are running scared. Calling other peoples opinions about a candidate spam shows just how little you know about the political process and what it takes to make an informed choice.
2007-12-14 03:14:18 · answer #9 · answered by bootsontheroad 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
With the final months of primary elections you need overexposure, at least he has name recognition! unlike Dodd or Kusinich who no one hears of as of late!
2007-12-14 02:44:10 · answer #10 · answered by Sasha 4 · 6⤊ 6⤋