Well we don't need to get into details here. But most of
us know, and the rest of the world understand how much
we need a Democratic president. The 90's were a
landmark era for the US. Some said, it was as good, if
not better than the 50's. According to Alan Greenspan.....
But what ever happened to the Bush dynasty. I cannot
find 1 news network, not even FOX NEWS, that can
actually say something good about him. Not one. No
way near what it was in 2004, nope, not this time.
Funny how things change so quickly. NPR radio is a
great source of information, with issues on real life
situations, and real people. No soundbites, or Conservative
rhetoric. So, it is looking good for the Democrats, and
they will win the White House. What I wanna know is what
happened to the Bush dynasty, and why they don't care
about having a great legacy, left behind ?
2007-12-14 02:01:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
GOPer. Your question makes no sense. He was one of the greatest
presidents ever. And perhaps is now
the most popular. What planet are
you from. Mars ? Wise up.
2007-12-14 02:07:50 · update #1
you said it all right there. it is a flop for good hard working people, for liar, murders, and theives, it been great.
2007-12-14 02:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
History is going to be George W. Bush judge. What he has done in Iraq will go one of two ways:
Iraq will either become a free and stable society, which benefits us greatly or it remain the way it is.
If it goes the free and democratic way, then Bush is a hero. If it goes the other we he is a goat.
People forget or don't study their history. FDR was vilified by a good portion of this country about getting us into WW II even with the attack on Pearl Harbor. Today he is revered as one of the greatest Presidents in our history.
While I am not comparing W to FDR, I am making the point that both of them had to make tough choices and let history be their judge.
What makes me sick, is the left feels really good when casualty reports or setbacks happen in Iraq.
If they spent as much time helping the troops, as they do fighting them, then this war would be going much better.
2007-12-14 04:32:09 · answer #2 · answered by wcowell2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought you were insane then I read that you get your information from NPR. News flash NPR, Juan Williams and the rest of the group are extream liberals that distort the news. Watch C-SPAN actual live broadcast of the house or senate some day and find out what really happens then listen to NPR, FOX, ABC, NBC, CNN, etc. and determine for yourself who gives an acurate reflection of the news. You will be amazed. I never thought the media was bias until I did this and I know you won't believe me right now though FOX news was the only station that acurately portrayed what happened during the day. I don't want or expect you to believe me I just want you to do this yourself sometime when there is a big issue being debated in the house or senate. I'm confident you will leave amazed at how the main stream media including NPR and AP take things our of context and report it as news. They take sound bites that don't reflect the comment and report it as news. Please have an open mind to see the truth and do this for yourself.
2007-12-14 02:23:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
WCowell2 - Why don't you speak of the Presidents with respect. It should be President Bush and President Roosevelt!
Thanks!
And no the dynasty isn't a flop!
2007-12-14 04:54:04 · answer #4 · answered by nothing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right, Bush was a disaster and it ain't over yet. Unfortunately, the Democratic congress has proven to be just the losers the Republitards say they are. Spineless and facilitating, sometimes initiating crimes against we the people. See: Jane Harman's Violent Radicalization Operation Mindcrime horse$#it. Unfortunately the only Democrat worth a lick is Mike Gravel, and the loser Dems, right on cue, put him in last place.
Ron Paul '08
2007-12-14 02:10:40 · answer #5 · answered by doug4jets 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Everything happens with time. Clinton had the better days because Reagan and Bush(father) worked hard to shape up the US. Once Clinton got the presidence he didn't do crap. It was Reagan and Bush(father) that deserve the credit. Under Clinton's watch, every single terrorist that were on those planes in 9/11 infiltrated to the US. Now, because of his arrogance we are paying the price.
The only thing that Clinton do is ride the train that Reagan and Bush provided.
2007-12-14 02:11:09 · answer #6 · answered by Con4Life 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, that's why he's trying to look like a peace maker between Palestine and Israel, and trying to look fiscally conservative with the SCHIP expansion. We can eagerly look forward to further legacy initiatives like these, and perhaps even a real program to go to Mars.
2007-12-14 02:12:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Inbreeding starts to show sign of affliction after the 3rd or 4th generation... that explains Bush.
2007-12-14 02:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
While you guys argue, the animal in the White House keeps stealing mega millions of dollars, into his family account either in Dubai or Swiss.
Have a nice day.
2007-12-14 02:16:38 · answer #9 · answered by emilia d 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Everything about Bush a flop... too bad.. I thought his dad was a good guy! Too much for baby Bush to live up to.
2007-12-14 02:23:52 · answer #10 · answered by myopinion 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The greatest achievement of the Bush administration is his Supreme Court nominations. The man has given us two outstanding justices who will shape our judicial branch for decades.
2007-12-14 02:13:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋