get what they want. Or a person hat has everything already and is willing to lie steal and cheat people that have nothing just to get more?
2007-12-14 01:26:51 · 14 answers · asked by Vivianna 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Neither is good, but stealing the little from the poor by the rich is more disgusting of the two options.
2007-12-14 01:47:55 · answer #1 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this is all state of opinion, but i would say that the person who has everything will like, steal, and cheat people that have nothing to get more for themselves. what do you think?
2007-12-14 09:37:43 · answer #2 · answered by hey hey hey i'm wus happenin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are the same. The merit is in who does it better. A great thief is an 'artist' of his vocation. Mastery of the 'art of deception' takes the same discipline and effort as mastery of theater or music or carpentry. Society has deemed overt 'steeling' as unacceptable but covert 'steeling' like market inflation and cost control as acceptable. The lure of the marketer is just as deceptive as the con man.
The goal is the same.
2007-12-14 10:03:57 · answer #3 · answered by @@@@@@@@ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for me,it is ok for a rich man to make a lie just to get what they want,for such reason that at least they already make it into to top,and gaind their wants.,they can return what they took or stole.,
not like a person that has nothing,even though we say that its need but,the question can't they strive hard to attain their needs and is only stealing or cheating the only way?.,try to cheat when you know that you are in postion to cheat.,
i'm not trying to discriminate man,but then that's the fact.,it is ok for the rich to enjoy for they have money use to enjoy,it is ok for poor to enjoy if they made it to become rich and have money use to enjoy.,get it?.,
for such answer,i'm not expecting you to choose it as best one for my opinion is no sense.,good day.,
2007-12-14 10:01:09 · answer #4 · answered by matmat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well obviously is the person who haves everything and steels to get more. this man is greedy, the other is in need, but unfortunately when it comes to law, the poor does time wile the rich rites a check and keeps steeling.
jaja the rich that wants more sounds like a politician :D
2007-12-14 09:40:29 · answer #5 · answered by Nergal 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is grounding "good and bad" or "better and worse." In my pagan system, I say that the rich taking from the poor is worse because it isolates access to knowledge in a more rigid manner.
2007-12-14 09:49:02 · answer #6 · answered by Mandy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lie, steal, cheat is not a good thing regardless of circumstance. So it is abhorent in either scenerio.
2007-12-14 11:50:59 · answer #7 · answered by gryphon1911 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to say a person who has everything, what more could you possibly need, a person like this is just down right greedy and evil, that's just my opinion. I actually know someone like this, I avoid her at every opprotunity, she is nice to me but something about her gives me the creeps, you know that feeling in your gut when someone just isn't right.
2007-12-14 10:11:58 · answer #8 · answered by robink71668 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fear drives both of them so I don't see a lot of difference between them.
It is like asking If you prefer someone with brown eyes or blue.
Peripherals are irrelevant. Fear is the source of the problem
Love and blessings Don
2007-12-14 10:26:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well like the saying goes only a man with a full belly will speak of morals.
2007-12-14 10:10:56 · answer #10 · answered by mtheoryrules 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋