if this creature become extinct tomorrow it is estimated that all life on earth would die out within 4 years?

Question

WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE CREATURE IS THAT WOULD KILL ALL LIFE IF IT BECAME EXTINCT

Answer 1

I would guess photoplankton...
First it is the main source of photosynthesis on our planet, second many aquatic animals depend on it for their lives, and as you go up the food chain, you will see that it is the main producer on our planet--if it was gone it would upset the circle of life.

Answer 2

Look, there is no such creature, but if you absolutely have to have an answer, then I'll say the Llama. A world without llamas would be so depressing that everything would just die off from despair within four years. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.

Answer 3

False. There is no single species meeting that criterion.

For the guy above who said "bacteria," that's a grouping, not a single species. You might as well say that if all the prokaryotes and eukaryotes became extinct tomorrow, then all life would be killed tomorrow. Useless.

Answer 4

inhabitants growth is something that Doomsday fans have been speaking approximately for years. It became into as quickly as believed that the Human inhabitants ought to no longer exceed 4 billion because of the fact there does no longer be sufficient room in the international for everyone to stay and nonetheless have the skill to consume or perhaps breath. at the instant the inhabitants is around the 6 billion mark and that i for you could nonetheless breath and there continues to be nutrition. in fact there is feilds that are being left fallow for the subsequent 3 hundred and sixty 5 days or 2 so an more desirable high quality of nutrition could be produced. We as a spiecis have the skill to think of and plan for destiny activities. No different animal has that skill or a minimum of to the quantity that we've. A squirle for occasion isn't storing nuts because of the fact it knows of iciness is coming and has to make confident it has sufficient for the finished iciness, like a nut an afternoon. It shops nutrition because of the fact it is programed into it is DNA and instincts. i've got those days study comments, no longer by making use of a single "scientist" yet ones that have been printed by making use of a extensive team that certainly particularly researched the situation and got here up with the variety that if we don't develop our contemporary nutrition, housing and worry-unfastened clinical information, that the Human inhabitants can attain approximately 12 billion till now we attain severe problems. So it takes us approximately 10 years to advance by making use of one billion and that may not counting the fact that the international inhabitants is particularly suitable heavy because of the fact of this there are alot extra previous human beings than youthful ones. truthfully there will be problems that pop up, no person will see them coming and that they are going to be ultimately delt with. we can proceed to advance as a human beings and our inhabitants will advance besides.

Answer 5

I don't believe that any single creature going extinct would cause ALL other life to disappear.

Why should the absence of bees make it impossible for grasses to grow? Grasses are wind-pollenated.

Answer 6

There is no such creature. Even if all algae (cyanobacteria and protists) were killed, some life would survive the ensuing crisis, when most of the oxygen production in the world ended.

Answer 7

well, things begin with the sun, and by using the sun, plants can photosynthesize.so technically, all things start with those two, but if they come down to creatures, it would be the primary consumers and i think it depends on which animals eat that.

Answer 8

The bee, of course. It wouldn't have much effect on ocean life but a lot of land based life would be in big trouble.

Answer 9

well it has to be something at the beginning of the food chain soooooooo! Plankton? amoeba?
I know its the dung beetle, cause without it the world would fill up with sh*t?

Answer 10

Plankton.