English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. Kennedy
B. Nixon
C. Johnson
D Reagan

2007-12-14 00:32:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

E. Carter

"The formal exchange of diplomatic recognition between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China occurred on January 1st, 1979."

I would consider full diplomatic recognition of a country to be "normalized relations" - wouldn't you?

2007-12-14 03:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by WMD 7 · 0 0

B, but this is definitely a loaded question.
Nixon was a red baiter his whole political career and relations with China would have probably been normalized before his administration, except for the hysteria he and his ilk promoted.
The perception during the fifties and the sixties was that Communism was some sort of monolithic force that The U.S. had to somehow contend with. Thus the Vietnam war. The reasoning was while fighting in Vietnam we were actually fighting Communism worldwide. The Chinese and Vietnamese actually have a long history of animosity as witnessed by the hostilities of 1979. The Soviets and China also have a history of conflict.
In summary, Nixon normalized relations with China. But because of the political atmosphere he and others created, only he could have done it.

2007-12-14 00:56:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It relies upon on what variety of give way...If it is a head on melancholy or in basic terms a hiccup of a recession. the two way, the Philippines (like another united states of america) is heavily based on the USA. look what occurred while the plain recession hit the Dow, while it fell, the pse fell...annoying, to this element shares could no longer get well because of the fact of each and every of the internal and exterior components. The exterior components are heavily stimulated by making use of the states, for occasion, assuming it reaches element of melancholy, it would stop importation of the two products and immigrants, for this reason we unfastened our greatest procuring and merchandising significant different and between the biggest supplies of the remitances that now variety a significant element of the monetary device... i think of we would be heading nowhere so promptly we does no longer even be conscious that our monetary device had already collapsed... I advise we have not even recovered completely because of the fact the 1997 monetary disaster...(i think of) the united statescollapse would carry a give way of the international monetary device... If the united statesmonetary device would give way...it is

2016-11-03 05:56:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The true answer is Mckinley, in 1900.
But your teacher uses 'normalized' to mean 'unaturally friendly', so the answer is B, Nixon (advised by Kissinger).

2007-12-14 00:48:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

B. Nixon

2007-12-14 02:50:42 · answer #5 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

Answer is A.Kennedy

2007-12-16 14:12:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers