Why did no large planet form between Mars and Jupiter?

Answer 1

Because God did not provide for it to.

Answer 2

Planet Between Mars And Jupiter

Answer 3

There may be a few possible reasons why no major planet is seen between Mars and Jupiter.

On popular idea is major disruption due to Jupiter's influence. Jupiter is massive. Even today, it creates zones of lower densities in the asteroid belt. Orbits that would be in resonance with Jupiter's orbital period (e.g., 1:2) gets a gravitational boost from Jupiter at the same point of its orbit: this pushes the asteroid into a new orbit, away from the resonant orbit.

Because of that, maybe there are many smaller planetoids that formed instead and through collisions among themselves and with objects (e.g., comets) thrown into their path after being diverted by Jupiter, were reduced to smaller chunks.If some things that we would call "dwarf planets" had formed at some point and had started to differentiate, before being knocked back to chunks, this would explain why some asteroids are almost all metal while others seem to contain very little metal.

Maybe some planet did form and was destroyed by some large body. A bit like our Earth probably collided with a Mars-sized object and the partsof Earth that flew off the planets eventually formed the Moon.

However, this idea, popular a century ago, is now less preferred.

Answer 4

Now that we know about planets around other stars, it is clear that the formation of planetary systems is a lot more chaotic than we thought, based on the example of just our own system.

The main requirement for a stable solar system that survives for billions of years is that the planets be spaced out, and have incommesurate periods, so that billions of small perturbations don't add up to a significant disruption. It's not necessary that all the possible orbits be occupied. So it's not as if a planet should be there but is not. It's apparently a gap, but there is nothing that would suggest that a planet is actually missing.

As pointed out above, the influence of massive Jupiter makes that the one possible orbit that is, in fact, least likely to be filled.

Answer 5

Well, the current prevailing theory is that the materials in that orbit failed to form a planet.

This is due the fact if the asteroid belt was the remain an exploded planet, the scientists don't know on how it was exploded, plus accepting the idea of a Death Star-like type of destruction is considered as blasphemous in the scientific community.

The theory of an exploded planet is more accepted a century ago, since they don't accept the accretion theory of planet formation.



However, if the failed to form planet theory was true, the asteroid belt should have long gone by now. The theory will become even more confusing, if the accretion theory is proven to be false.

Answer 6

The gravitational tidal forces of Jupiter prevented the formation of such a planet. Any material that began to accrete into a planet there would simply be torn apart by Jupiter. Some astronomers believe that the asteroid belt lying between Mars and Jupiter is what's left of a planet that might have tried to form.

Answer 7

There are 2 significant theories approximately what led to the asteroid belt: the two a planet shaped there interior the early photograph voltaic device and then broke aside, or a planet by no ability controlled to style there. If a planet did used to exist between Jupiter and Mars, it could have been broken up via a collision with yet another extensive physique. possibly 2 proto-planets smacked into one yet another or some thing. yet at the instant scientists think of it somewhat isn't any longer likely. different planets in our photograph voltaic device have collided with proto-planets (it somewhat is how astronomers think of Earth's moon grew to become into shaped, it grew to become into portion of the Earth that grew to become into knocked off via a collision with yet another physique on the subject of the scale of Mars), and that they did no longer shatter into an asteroid belt. some astronomers additionally think of a planet ought to no longer have shaped there by using fact Jupiter's huge gravity might have disrupted the ability of planetary formation. it somewhat is greater possibly that no planet ever shaped there, by using results of Jupiter's gravity. thus, the asteroid belt is what -might- have shaped a planet if Jupiter hadn't been there to disrupt it. interior the early photograph voltaic device, there have been distinctive bits of rock, ice, and dirt floating around from which the planets shaped. the reason there are not many asteroids during the the remainder of the photograph voltaic device is that the planets have "mopped them up," i.e. all the asteroids with orbits that intersected the orbit of a planet have crashed right into a planet and grow to affix its mass via now. The asteroid belt nonetheless has distinctive little chunks of rock by using fact they weren't able to style right into a planet, and there is no different planet there to mop them up. To my awareness, there is no way for a planet to "explode" from the interior. there is only no rigidity sufficiently massive, different than possibly a runaway nuclear reaction like people who power the celebs. Our planets are way, way too small to start nuclear fusion. So i do no longer think of them exploding is particularly a possibility.

Answer 8

There's a theory saying that there was a planet in that place named (Tiamat ) and it was destroyed in a collision with another planet (Nibiru) orbiting the sun in a very long orbit .This theory put by Sitchins based on some Sumerians writings .I read that in his site.

Answer 9

If the planet was as big as jupiter as close to the sun as we are i sun would rip it apart.

Answer 10

The asteroids in the asteriod belt (which is between mars & jupiter) would smash a planet to pieces!