"Everything you always wanted to know about sex (but were afraid to ask)"? Yes, the new version.
If you are an old timer, at what age would you have considered okay to read the old version of it.
2007-12-13 22:10:18 · 5 answers · asked by Sweetness_and_Light 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
What do you mean by,"Old Timer"? I'm hoping you meant it as a back-handed compliment (however gauche) but,back to your question.I think it's an indivual thing.Some people are emotionally more mature than others at the same age.I read it(The "Old Timer's Version") when I was 13 ad it didn't really answer a lot of the questions I had.Personally,I think the book was (and is) salacious at worst & gratuitious at best and not even worth the bother when there are so many more consise,no nonsense books on the subject.
TL
2007-12-14 03:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by TL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
15
2007-12-14 06:13:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
16
2007-12-14 06:17:19 · answer #3 · answered by Mag 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
26
2007-12-14 06:20:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a lot better sex references out there, that I wouldn't bother with either version. I really didn't think much of the book when i was young and very curious about sex. The Joy of Sex was very informative. I learned a lot from that book.
Why are you so fascinated with this work? There are so many better one's on the subject to choose from.
2007-12-14 22:05:48 · answer #5 · answered by Toshiro O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋