What if a majority of the U.S. people decided there wasn't an acceptable candidate for President?

Question

Shouldn't we have the right to delay the election if most people had no acceptance of fools? Could we sue the federal government for lack of morals? After all, haven't they been teaching us 'morals' for all this time? I can rember back in the farm days when the fed printed out 'How to' pamplets for mothers and families, and...how to raise our crops, and now our children, now our private lives....where does it end???? The Constitution of course.

Answer 1

Haven't we done that already? The percentage of voters to the voting population is always less than 50%.

I personally think there should be a "none of the above" vote and if that wins, each party must go back and hold another primary.

Answer 2

Well, it's your opinion. Whether you like it or not, there will be people voting and there will be a president.

And to top it all off, this is NOT a question. It's a form of "wondering" what could happen. And if there was a question somewhere, you just answered yourself on the end.

Answer 3

if a majority of the U.S. people decided there wasn't an acceptable candidate for President, then the minority would decide who is to be the next president.

Answer 4

sorry to say to all of the n.w.o. gang Ron Paul is the only one for America

Answer 5

the majority of the people don't vote , its the minority that votes , if the majority would get off of their butts and get involved we might get better officials

Answer 6

Congress will determine who will be the President.

Answer 7

It doesen't matter - electoral college decides - voters are mearly popular vote(it don't count) they just let you voice your opinon