So far the media isn't saying bad things about her administrative skills - no need her staff keeps resigning.
If she can't hire ethical people to get her elected - what do you think she will do if she were elected??
2007-12-13 15:58:17 · 15 answers · asked by diblyhoo 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I do not think it will be the headline for 4 years when she is elected.
The headlines will be how she and Obama successfully finish the mess in Iraq, bring peace to the Middle East, fix America's education and health care systems, create jobs in an abundance, and make us all forget about George.
2007-12-13 16:05:02 · answer #1 · answered by NANOOK 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
She is going to play the pity card for a week or two when it was really planned all along. Once again the Clinton contempt for the public shows through. Having the negative news about Obama make it just in time for the debate and putting the blame on her manager is typical of the games Clinton's play. Put the blame on anyone instead of accepting the facts. The Public will not be fooled all the time and one of these so called unauthorized disclosures will take her out of the running.
2007-12-13 16:04:06 · answer #2 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She would be, if elected, far too busy managing her own staff to do anything for our country. I just wonder..she wants to lead the greatest military on earth, and the greatest country in the world and she cant seem to manage a few hundred staff members effectively.
She reminds me of her hubbie..he claimed all 8 (or so) of the women who claimed they had sex with were lying...at least until one of them came up with DNA evidence, then he says that was not sex as he defines sex. How does Hillary define "leadership skills"? She should publish a book, "Management by putting out fires"
2007-12-13 16:23:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's not going to get elected. The only democrat that stands a chance is John Edwards. He's the happy medium between Clinton and Obama.
I can see it being a race between John Edwards and Mike Huckabee for the 2008 ticket.
2007-12-13 16:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by JavaJoe 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, by then she won't have a staff left to fire. You can only treat people like that for so long before they walk out on you. She seems to think that everyone but her is expendable. God help us if she gets elected.
2007-12-13 16:21:27 · answer #5 · answered by fasteddie79103 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would support a leader who requested her/his staff resigned than keeping that staff, as per Bush to Rove.
It is a naieve to think all staff are perfect.
2007-12-14 04:04:42 · answer #6 · answered by T E 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will not be a headline and would only be brought up by the Bill O'Reilly's of the world on his show while it remains on the air. It will be taken off the air as soon as Rupert Murdoch sees the political climate has changed and right wing TV is out of style.
Whoever the eventual Dem candidate is (I hope it will be Edwards) will get us out of Iraq and start working to re-establish our reputation in the world.
2007-12-13 16:15:32 · answer #7 · answered by mickbw 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Grabbing at straws? The Clinton campaign has taken politics to a new low. Clinton's campaign is dying.
2007-12-13 16:11:10 · answer #8 · answered by Blake 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you are referring to Senator Clinton's diverse cabinet as President--have no fears. It will be the most focused, coordinated and disciplined cabinet in history.
Every member will enjoy the freedom to openly express themselves to her open ear. She will reach out to the brightest and yes--the common man and or woman for advise.
Just like today--any problems will be dealt with immediately and publicly.
2007-12-13 16:20:51 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
God forbid she is ever elected, she is an evil woman, and a cheat and a liar, I cannot see why anyone in their right mind would endorse this socialistic woman, no way
2007-12-13 16:39:20 · answer #10 · answered by poopsie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋