why is 9-11 NOT an inside job?

Question

hmmmmm
It is very clear that you CANNOT answer the question. Either you have evaded the question completely or resorted to your "tin foil' sort of "explanations".

You can't answer the question because there is NO answer as to why 9-11 was NOT an inside job. Period.

go ahead and report it to Yahoo so that it gets deleted- which is your favorite when you run out of steam.

Answer 1

You could fill a book with the evidence why it was NOT an inside job.

1. SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS

Every single expert (in demolition & engineering), on the face of the earth, who has published a journal article on 9/11, has rejected the conspiracy "science."

You can't find single, solitary, lone engineer who has published an article, in a real journal, in favor of the conspiracy.

This is a powerful fact that effectively puts an end to the conspiracy tales.

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

2. LACK OF A MOTIVE THAT MAKES SENSE
--Money Motive - Why would Bush (or whoever) take such a risk as doing 9/11 when he could make all the money he wants by: receipt of lobbying, giving himself options, awarding pork barrel contracts, getting kickbacks, etc., etc.

--Insider Trading - All financial transactions are a matter of public record. Anyone making money off of 9/11 would be instantly exposed. Buying “put options” is like screaming “Here I am. Come and arrest me!” You can’t do these transactions anonymously.
Of course, the FBI checked all 9-11 associated profit making and found nothing significant . See Point 6, at:
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355

--Oil motive - Conspiracy folks claim that we invaded Iraq “to get its oil.” We haven’t got any, nor will we. We are not allowed to take oil out of Iraq. We buy it like everyone else.
Also, there’s nothing magical about oil: Getting money is also good because it can buy oil. However, we’ve SPENT a trillion dollars in Iraq. That’s a lot of oil we could have bought.

--Military spending - Military spending goes on all the time, in war & in peace. These guys make tons of money. Why risk killing 3000 Americans for what you already have?

--Other Vague motives - Conspiracy folks say we did 9/11 so we could “further our agenda in the middle east.” A vague, meaningless motive. Vague claims are usually false.

3. SECRECY
--As they say, 3 people can keep a secret IF 2 of them are dead. So many people would have to be involved that SOMEONE should have come forward by now. At least one single, solitary person MUST leak, even if accidently, SOMETHING.

4. KNOWN KILLERS
--Al-Qaeda is the self-admitted agent with documented motives. In 1993, they attacked the WTC using a truck bomb and they were behind the attack on the US in Mogadishu. In 1996, Bin Laden issued a fatwa (basically a declaration of war) against the United States. In 2000 al-Qaeda bombed the missile destroyer U.S.S. Cole near Yemen, killing 17 servicemen. They bombed trains in London and Spain, and have been active in Algeria, Somalia and Kenya, Pakistan, etc, etc. The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, admitted guilt in court.

The "9-11 Commission Report" presents a mountain of evidence on top of this pointing to Al Qaeda.

5. VAGUENESS OF THE PERPETRATOR
--The conspiracy theorists never say exactly who is behind the 9/11 inside job. This is a sign that the claim is false.

The conspiracists are afraid to name a specific person because then we could examine that person & instantly prove the conspiracy people wrong. So, they hide behind vagueness.

6. FROM THE HIJACKERS TO OSAMA
The 19 hijackers came to the US years before 9-11 and took flight-training & physical training to prepare for the attack. They came into contact with hundreds of people who were subsequently debriefed, allowing us to reconstruct their movements. They were funded by monies that have been traced directly back to Osama Bin Laden. They were on the flight manifests & were caught on security cameras. The flight recorder from Flight 93 caught their Arabic orders at the end (“Bring it down” and “Allah is great”). Etc.

7. WRONG PSYCHOLOGY
--Believe it not, most politicans are not murderers. Very few people have the psychological makeup to be mass-murderers, & they usually show signs of it beforehand.
------

Answer 2

Those folks who have espoused the official story need help. There are some pretty wild alternative theories, but the official propaganda is really tiresome. It essentially comes down to this:

We're Americans. We decide who should be in office and what questions they have to answer while they are there. There are so many unanswered questions about 9/11 that it needs to be examined much more closely. People that don't want to do that don't have to, but those of us that need answers should get them, in exhaustive detail. We haven't even come close with the 9/11 commission's report, and every person whose ever watched an episode of CSI knows it. As victims and taxpayers, we need answers.

There just aren't good reasons why 9/11 is NOT an inside job. That's the problem--there are a whole lot more that point to it BEING an inside job. Where there is smoke, there is fire folks and there is still a lot of smoke.

On Nov. 23, 1963 (the day after), 99% of Americans believed that Oswald killed Kennedy. In 1978, Congress (that's right, Congress) concluded that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy and that there was at least one other gunman. That was kept pretty quiet, but it's out there and now that millions have watched the Zapruder film (and seen how even it may have been tampered with), the idea that Oswald acted alone is just not valid. In fact, based purely on the physics, it's impossible.

I think you'll see the same thing happen with 9/11. I hope it happens sooner and with more consequences. I'm not sure it will though. But, the fact remains that it is not treasonous or radical to ask questions of one's government. In fact, it's the most patriotic thing you can do. The country deserves our support all the time. Politicians don't--they have to earn it. This administration has earned only one thing in my eyes--A SEAT IN THE WITNESS CHAIR. What would you ask if you were cross examining the Bush administration???

Answer 3

because lets see i lost 3 ppl that day 2 of which were on the airplanes

come on commonsense ppl

you drop an acre of concrete on an acre of concret the air looks for the quickest route which would to be blowing out the windows hence the little puffs of smoke

second of all a few of my friends work in industrial and commercial construction the spray on fire proofing now adays isn't that great let alone back in the 70s when those towers were built

Answer 4

Of course not. The whacked out Bush haters came up with a pretty unbelievable alternative to reality. Here it is:

"Bush, the stupidest human being in the history of the planet, singlehandedly arranged for those planes to fly into the buildings, but only after setting internal explosives in the buildings, and then personally warning all the Jews to stay home that day."

What's scary is that some people actually believe this.

Vote for Rudy!

Answer 5

Because to believe it was is to believe that hundreds of US military personnel knowingly obeyed orders that would result in the deaths of 3000 innocent people. The only soldiers I know like that are in Hollywood movies and bear no resemblance to real members of the military.
To the person that called me a "government shill" if you could product one shred of evidence that would prove any of what you are saying is true, I would be calling for a new investigation. But of course you can't, and you insult me and thousands of veterans in your "Bush derangement sydrome".

Answer 6

Hey smith I mean cheney you are nothing but a govt schill!!!! Why if it was an inside job it would take hundreds to be in on it and you are ok with the govt conspiracy theory of just OBL and 19 guys pulled off this event. I mean you must beleive OBL knew that there were exercises that simulated highjacked planes that day that would confuse the FAA. BRILLIANT!!!! He also must have known that no fighter jets would do their job that day!!!! This man is amazing!!!!

Answer 7

instead of thinking about the past why don't we question why the Bush Admin just cut the budget for Homeland Security and declared the dept is unneeded. Cut the budget for local law enforcement and disaster emergency prepardness. Accused Iran of being terrorists, then changed it's mind. When do you think something else is going to get blown up and it'll be conveniently blamed on Iran so we have backing of the blind sheep American people to go to war. We already played this game...and saw the results in 9-11.

Answer 8

handygirl!!!
nothin personal,
but i think i love you!!!

its just amazing how they pucker up the anal cavaties and the braincells and nothin of any value can enter their system !!!

its like a possum in danger curling up and goin into a coma!!!

they just will not listen!!!


YES!!!
there needs to be a real investigation!!!
and who in the f**k is stopping us from having one????!!!!!

Answer 9

Because conspiracy theorists were fed lead paint chips with their corn flakes when they were young.

Answer 10

cause the planes came from the OUTSIDE