bill clinton as far back as 1996 was trying to fight terrorism and gop was dragging their feet, instead of defending america they were looking for some stain on a blue dress.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/
2007-12-13 15:45:17 · 16 answers · asked by luis s 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Conservatives (or neo-cons) don't think Dems are weak on terrorism. They want YOU to think that Dems are weak on terrorism. That way you won't vote Dem. Generally speaking, the Democratic Party represents the masses, while the Republican Party stands up for the rich and corporations. In order to get people to vote against their own self-interest, the Republicans have to come up with divisive issues like these.
2007-12-13 15:50:18 · answer #1 · answered by joannemb1964 1 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Obama's election marketing campaign promise grew to become into to make the alterations necessary and that it grew to become into no longer likely to be consumer-friendly. The "status quo" has lots income at stake on the rate of the middle type that there is not any longer something they gained't do to dam any and all alterations. Can anybody forget approximately that the Republicans demanded alterations to the Stimulus bill interior the pretense that they might then provide their help? And the compromises they demanded have been a "bait and turn" tactic and all yet 3 Republicans nonetheless voted NO? If the well being Care Reform is defeated this time around there will be outcomes lots greater severe then what surpassed off interior the ninety's. And the GOP won't get away the offended backlash from people who go through those unfavorable outcomes. electorate overcame the phobia methods used interior the election and that i'm hoping they see during the phobia methods as quickly as returned. And if the well being Care Reform bill is surpassed as a diluted version that keeps the status quo the backlash will fall on the two events in 2010.
2016-11-26 22:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm..hello..Bill Clinton was the one that called off the assasination attempt on Osama, when the CIA had a clear sniper shot on him...if it wasen't for him 9/11 wouldn't have happened or at least not at the hands of Osama..and I hate Clinton for the simple fact that he let our Rangers go into Somalia and get shot up just to pull them out the next day. He was controlled by opinion polls...so basically he had no balls.
2007-12-13 15:52:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they already found that. I am not here to defend either party. . They (both Dems and Reps) caused this mess by trying to control the world like they do us. Well someone finally got pissed enough to do something about it = 9/11. Wish people in this country had the courage and brains to at least vote for a third party candidate. The more things change the more they stay the same.
2007-12-13 15:53:51 · answer #4 · answered by okrife 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because when anyone asks them what they would do about terrorism they say:
We'd just talk to them. We'd use diplomacy. Ya know, just a nice quiet fire side chat sipping cappuccinos and roasting marshmallows.
2007-12-13 15:54:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well can you honestly say that any of the liberal candidates running for the presidency are tough on terrorists. None of them are inb favor of the war and not even enhanced interrogation techniques. God forbid if we left Iraq, everyone knows overrun countries are a spawning pool for terrorists. All the liberals seem to be isolationists.
2007-12-13 15:49:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Many people believe that Bill Clinton decided to bomb a country because he was about to be caught in a lie. You know, like a kind of therapy.
2007-12-13 15:47:44 · answer #7 · answered by abstruse 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Terrorism is just a the perfect way to sustain an eternal war for profits.
Vote Ron Paul and join the rEVOLution
2007-12-13 16:12:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Republicans are going to oppose anything the Dems propose and vise versa. That's why we need proportional representation and a true multi-party system.
2007-12-13 15:48:22 · answer #9 · answered by handygirl 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because they are? There was a world trade center bombing by Al-Qaeda under Clinton's watch as well as Al-Qaeda attacks on our embassies in Africa. Didn't Clinton respond by bombing an abandoned baby-formula factory or something?
2007-12-13 15:48:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋