Do you think that your life is LESS important than a BANK?
2007-12-13 15:30:02 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Nope. Non-violent.
2007-12-13 15:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by Big Super 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It would depend on the situation. If there was one robber and I was close to point blank range with no people that would be in danger of being hit, I probably would. However, most robbers, especially bank robbers, have a partner, so I wouldn't want him to go nuts and kill innocent people. If there were lives that were imminently threatened like he had already shot people, i would definetely shoot him but for the same reason one does not try to help cops stop a runaway car by sideswiping it is because taking the law into your own hands can have unforeseen consequences.
2007-12-13 15:34:48 · answer #2 · answered by David 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This question is confusing. Am I in the bank? Are they threatening my life as well as robbing the bank?
If I'm just a bystander and they take the money and run, no. Why would I? Banks are insured for those types of things. Why risk my future and a possible conviction for some corporation?
If I were in the bank and they were threatening to hurt us and not really in it for the money then damn right I'd shoot at them.
2007-12-13 15:34:03 · answer #3 · answered by Alicia 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Only if they threatened to hurt someone. But you'd have to shoot when other people were out of the way. It may be risky to wait until they have a hostage in hand. But if the robbery is over and they are running away, NO, let them go!
2007-12-13 15:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by Sunshine Buttercup 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in line with probability the Met are extra experienced with company palms and subject like that extra advantageous than the Hampshire police. I say properly carried out to the Police for doing a great activity, shall we are hoping they don't ought to have an enquiry into the shooting. Police ought to have the skill to act like this, then in line with probability human beings would be too scared to commit those style of crimes back.
2016-11-03 05:20:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a concealed carry license. By Ohio law, it is NOT legal to use deadly force to defend property - only to defend your life or the life of another. If the robbers were getting away without further threatening anyone, I would get a license plate number (and a big reward). Only IF they appeared ready to shoot someone would I fire my weapon.
2007-12-13 15:34:57 · answer #6 · answered by nytebreid 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what I would do. On one hand, I see the criminals as being desperate and really NEEDING the money...If I killed them, and they were just doing what they had to do to pay the bills...then I might let them go.
On the other hand, if I was feeling violent I might just shoot out the tires of their getaway car so that the cops can have time to get there and sort the situation out by doing their jobs. it's not necessarily my job as a citizen to make sure the law is enforced.
2007-12-13 15:38:42 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Miss Lustie♥ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on the situation. And no I don't think my life is less important than a bank.
2007-12-13 15:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Nico 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Shooting without thinking is not good. It may save bank but can entangle me in other complexes. In case the are just looting money and not causing hurt to people, let them loot. In case they are threatening for life to others then I must shoot them to save human lives.
2007-12-13 15:36:36 · answer #9 · answered by dev_bsg 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nope because I would end up getting charge with possession of a firearm and discharging a firearm, having a unregestered fireman and the list goes on... so to answer your question nope
2007-12-13 15:32:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I know my life is MORE important than the bank or the money...besides; the money is insured and replaceable. I'm hard to replace.
2007-12-13 15:37:29 · answer #11 · answered by CHI CHI 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋