Would this be a legal attempt in an NHL overtime shootout?
http://www.funnyhub.com/videos/pages/videos/amazing-hockey-goal.html
2007-12-13 15:05:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Hockey
In my very humble opinion, players SHOULD be allowed and encouraged by the rules and by the 'unwritten code' to do Hot Dog moves in the shootout. After all, the primary reason for the shootout is to increase the entertainment value of the product, not the extra point.
And I still think the NHL did the right thing to have shootouts in regular season games.
2007-12-13 15:28:16 · update #1
In my very humble opinion, players SHOULD be allowed and encouraged by the rules and by the 'unwritten code' to do Hot Dog moves in the shootout. After all, the primary reason for the shootout is to increase the entertainment value of the product, not the extra point.
And I still think the NHL did the right thing to have shootouts in regular season games.
2007-12-13 15:29:13 · update #2
Note - I have no idea whay the above paragraph was written twice.
2007-12-13 15:48:41 · update #3
green - all you need to know is
nose + tail + nards + hoofs + parasites = hot dogs
2007-12-13 15:50:52 · update #4
The did legalize that sort of thing. Ad it would be legal with high sticks and such, because it's only when the initial contact with the puck was made that the high stick goes into effect- the only challenge was that on a penalty shot, technically the puck has to be moving forward at all times. They loosened that up to allow for that exact type of thing.
Still wouldn't try it though. I would not be comfortable trying to do that reliably in a situation where it mattered.
That would be legal though very risky.
2007-12-13 16:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, over the summer the NHL 'legalized' trickery for the shootout after the moves Schremp and Malik used last year (both of which were technically 'illegal' at the time)
2007-12-13 15:17:59 · answer #2 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the NHL he would have never got to the point that he actually could take the shot. The goalie would have been on him in a flash...poke check...sliding save..whatever. In the video the goalie was just standing there watching.
2007-12-14 01:46:58 · answer #3 · answered by BeerSlayer The Coolest GameonIce 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If he does it in one motion then I think it should be legal. No one would take that risk in a shootout though. They would only do it if it was a practice.
MMMM hawdawgs are so yummy. They taste better coming up than going down :)
2007-12-13 15:10:28 · answer #4 · answered by Yeddie 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It probably would be legal, but I wouldn't advise him to do it. Hotdogs tend to leave a bad taste in your mouth and may be remembered for the next game.
2007-12-13 15:18:01 · answer #5 · answered by cme 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hot dogs???
When I eat them I get gas. I mean they really repeat on me.
Thing is I hate them and they taste bad going down so when they come back for another pass over my taste buds that's just disgusting.
You should never have to taste food you ate but didn't like twice.
Where's the Tums?
2007-12-13 15:27:18 · answer #6 · answered by PuckDat 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Never say never-look at the Malik SO goal. Who would have thought anyone would try that in a game?
2007-12-13 15:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Bob Loblaw 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the puck on his stick was above the crossbar when he shot it, would the goal count?
2007-12-13 16:06:30 · answer #8 · answered by -closed- 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋