I always thought that Bonds took steroids and I never liked him. Now that I found out Clemens did them, I don't like him either. What a disgrace! He took steroids before he got that old. What a jerk! If you dislike Bonds, then you MUST dislike Clemens. They both hit rock bottom in their record breaking careers which now, means nothing.
2007-12-13 13:27:15 · 15 answers · asked by Jack C 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Pujols was mentioned in the report? Wow! I did not see that!
2007-12-13 13:39:38 · update #1
I admit that I called Bonds a lying cheating @sshole . Now I think the same of Clemens . The steroid users are a disgrace to the game . Players like Bonds and Clemens had it all earlier in their careers and I guess it wasn't enough they just had to have more even if it meant cheating . Now when I think of them it's with disgust not admiration .
2007-12-13 14:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by RWB4646 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I thought he was an idiot before the report, and I still think he's an idiot now, no change. I can't stand hearing about him at the start of every season, deciding when and where he'll play each season is getting about as old as when Michael Jordan kept retiring, unretiring, retiring, unretiring,,,,give me a break. Nobody is worth what Clemens gets for a couple of months of work. It's like the attention of the baseball season isn't on King Clemens, so he pops up in the news each season, and that's all that's talked about,,,where is roger pitching, when is he pitching,,,,,who cares Juicer !! Go away and juice up !!
2007-12-13 21:56:54 · answer #2 · answered by yafvoc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, I never liked Clemens. You can just see the type of person he truly is when he waited until early summer to sign to a team. He basically waited until someone really needed him, and he exploited it. Look, if he would have went back to the Sox this past year, and ended his career there, he would have ended it with a Series win! But he took the money, and disrespected the game. ALSO, PUJLOS IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE REPORT! I read the entire report before, and his name is not mentioned once...
2007-12-13 21:42:26 · answer #3 · answered by J 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely will view him differently and hope the Astros cancel his coaching contract. Always knew about Pujols and never liked him. A little surprised about Clemens, though. I think we should wait until there is proof - does this Marshall report guy have proof or is he speculating? I looked at the report but it was about 300 pages, too long to skim.
2007-12-13 21:36:03 · answer #4 · answered by to the best of my knowledge ... 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have always loved clemens and hate to think that he and pujols are mentioned in the Report. I will not view him differently until he is suspended for steroids.
2007-12-13 21:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by mark 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well he is one of the guys I suspected so I kind of see him the same. I was never a big Clemens fan. Now if he continues to lie about this then I put him in the same boat as Bonds or McGuire or Palmero.... all phonies and liars.
2007-12-13 22:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by mpasnick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've got the downloaded doc, and the name "Pujols" appears zero times in it.
2007-12-13 22:06:08 · answer #7 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, the reason i hate barry is because he is an *** to the nth degree.... it wasn't right for either one to do it, but maybe i'm biased towards clemens 'cause he's my favorite, who knows?
2007-12-13 21:40:11 · answer #8 · answered by Cowherd, Jr. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. I didn't like him before and that hasn't changed. My opinion hasn't changed about any of the players on the list.
2007-12-13 21:31:08 · answer #9 · answered by Boston_Irish 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i never liked clemens so...
2007-12-13 22:10:43 · answer #10 · answered by dave 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋