If so, is this a sign of desperation?
2007-12-13 12:30:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
digging up kindergarten essays from opponents is always a sign of desperation.
2007-12-13 12:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Considering the smear tactic they launched yesterday then ducked behind a weak apology today, is there any doubt the Clintons play dirty?
This is just the start, if Iowa and NH go against Hillary, you'll see that campaign really deliver some very low blows to the competition.
2007-12-13 12:37:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes they are,I like her latest campaign slip,about Barack.That hes holding a slush fund and he might've sold drugs back in the day,which came outta her camp but tried to blame it on the right wingers,or the Campaign manager saying Obama was a Muslim and wanted to change the US.The Clinton camp is up to its same tricks(diversion and scandal) She is not a person I see with any morals or character.
2007-12-13 12:50:17 · answer #3 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of Ferraro has a factor. She became picked because of the fact the 1st woman vp candidate for strategic reasons. Polls coach that Blacks overwhelmingly help Obama. that is authentic that Whites have voted for him too yet you won't be able to deny the data in contact here. i like Obama, yet i won't allow you to be attentive to the way a lot of my Black acquaintances and family that help Obama because of the fact "that is approximately time" an identical innovations-set applies to Clinton among maximum of my woman acquaintances. my own mom is a conservative and needs Hillary because of the fact she is a woman. there is a few certainty to all of this and that i don't think of that it fairly is racist or sexist to state the obtrusive. Is it incorrect to help Him because of the fact he's Black? possibly, yet that is existence.
2016-11-03 04:53:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they are. She's just not as good at as Bill- who pulled this crap all the while acting like an "aw shucks" backwoods hillbilly... Hillary is extremely unlikable so shes not getting a benefit of the doubt from the public.
2007-12-13 13:41:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course she is playing dirty. Weren't you paying attention to the first 8 years of the Clinton"s?
2007-12-13 12:40:03 · answer #6 · answered by Brandon A 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
DUhhhh She is one of the Clinton's that moved to destroy anyone that gets in their way. How many times can someone from their campaign release harmful information on somebody without them knowing about it. This is either a lie or they employ very stupid inept staff. In either case would this be someone that you would want for president?
2007-12-13 12:52:26 · answer #7 · answered by Ranger473 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Politics is dirty and candidates must avoid this method in order that voters will be able to select the right President. The drug use of Obama must first be verified before this must be used to blemish his reputation.
2007-12-13 12:35:58 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
she's a clinton, of course she's playing dirty.
2007-12-13 12:36:35 · answer #9 · answered by Maggie 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're in panic mode now that the lead is disappearing.
2007-12-13 12:35:35 · answer #10 · answered by RICHARD B 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋