He will find some way out of it even though i beleive some where down his career he did use steroids.
2007-12-13 08:06:27 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
I think he will make the hall of fame. He will just deny these reports if they are true.
2007-12-13 08:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because in the report it states he began to use it in 1998 and there for after. You have to look his career before the stated dates in the report. Second the evidence is just someone who is saying that roger took them there truly is no true evidence that could hurt him in court if it ever came down to it.
Roger Clemens will be in the Hall of Fame first ballot along with Barry Bonds because you must look at their careers before the alleged steroid use, which would easily get both players into the hall of fame.
2007-12-13 16:13:11 · answer #2 · answered by paulfenderply57 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If anyone on this list makes the hall before Pete Rose that baseball has some HUGE priotiy issues to look at. His career was finished and his actions didn't affect the game, he bet on HIS team to win (who wouldn't...). If any of this happens, I'll start a Hall of Fame Boycott... How can you people defend this??? Who knows who good Roger even is, he's been Juicing since toronto... long time ago... Is Pudge the best catcher ever, I guess I'll never know? Doesn't ANYONE feel like you've been cheated?
2007-12-13 16:10:47 · answer #3 · answered by jakenyr 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The more we find the more likely that they make the Hall. We are proving that Roids were a normal practice in baseball. So everybody competed against other on Roids. There there was no real advantage gained. Case in point Bonds hitting against Clemens, who gained the most from the Roids? If you think about it Ruth had help too. Don't you think that two dozens hot dogs and a gallon of beer before the game helped him?
2007-12-13 16:11:41 · answer #4 · answered by John R 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think he has to be in. There is no way you can deny his entry into the hall. He is one of the best pitchers of all time, and has so many accomplishments. It appears that the steroid use came in his late career. He'll be in somehow.
2007-12-13 16:16:15 · answer #5 · answered by Steven S 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but whatever he contributes to the HOF needs a Marc Ecko asterisk burnt into it like the Barry Bond's baseball
2007-12-13 16:13:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he'll definately make it into the hall of Fame, despite the steroids, besides that, he probably used last season, he was huge!
2007-12-13 16:11:29 · answer #7 · answered by E.P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Geez I was just thinking that.
I don't know if you can deny 4 Cy Youngs before he according to the report he started using.
Though you don't really know that is just what they uncovered he may have used before then.
Additionally part of his resume is 300+ wins which he may not have made it to . . .
2007-12-13 16:10:55 · answer #8 · answered by bourgoise_10o 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think if steroids were used, awards should not be given, but of course this isn't realistic based on previous winners. i do think changes should be made from this point forward where awards will not be given if they are tested positive for steroids - what kind of role models are they for kids?
2007-12-13 16:10:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely 100% without question yes. Roids or not, the numbers are simply too amazing to ignore. That being said, I wasn't the least bit shocked that he was named and never really liked him in the first place.
2007-12-13 16:09:13 · answer #10 · answered by kevin r 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋