Obviously steriods are bad and it ridicualous that is even in baseball. But with that said the Mitchell report has many holes in it. Roger and Andy are the only two on the report that have solid proof that they used. Most of the list is hear say and speculation. I don't believe they should have named any names at all until they check everyone in baseball and know for sure. In the report he said there are more players out there taking steroids if they would have dug deeper. If i had a vote I would look just at that stats of each player because until you look at every player in baseball you cant just label those players of steroids user. Because more than likely they used at one time.
2007-12-13
08:02:06
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Bob S
1
in
Sports
➔ Baseball
I did see that but how do you know for sure with out a positive drug test even with that said how can you name just a portion of players with out naming them all.
2007-12-13
08:08:30 ·
update #1