oh it would have to be taste for me having learned to eat my partners cooking I can live without it
2007-12-13 07:40:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by wolf2croft 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smell
2007-12-13 07:39:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't they say, if you can't smell, then you can't taste either? So I'd have to keep both of those. Where would I be if I couldn't here the sweet sound of music? So I guess I could live without sight.
2007-12-13 07:38:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Taste
2007-12-13 07:37:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Little One 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Common sense
2007-12-13 08:00:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mine would be smell.
I could compensate for loss of smell but
not for loss of taste, hearing, sight or touch.
Its like saying would you rather lose your arms or your legs
2007-12-13 07:39:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mrs. P. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smell, it would even be a good thing in some ways.
2007-12-13 07:37:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kate J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smell...
2007-12-13 07:45:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by angel of senn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
taste, then I could be on those shows like fear factor and that show where that guy eats all that disgusting sh**. I would make a lot of money, being deprived of that sense. Of course no one would know that.
2007-12-13 07:42:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by I ? my assets. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smell...
2007-12-13 07:39:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by skaska 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They all are important, but I'd have to go with Taste.
If I had to give it up, I could deal without it.
2007-12-13 07:39:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋