English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-13 06:26:40 · 6 answers · asked by $1,539,684,631,121 Clinton Debt 6 in Politics & Government Government

I guess before you continue to talk about the war, she said this!!!

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source

2007-12-13 06:38:09 · update #1

I am not sure if you know this akissya, Clinton was president in 1998. Bush did not come in until 2001. So I don't get your statement on republicans since democrats where running the white house.

2007-12-14 01:54:22 · update #2

6 answers

Bush has spent $500,000,000,000 just to hang Saddam Hussein, with no means to pay for it.

Not a very conservative way to spend taxpayer money, if you ask me.

2007-12-13 06:32:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

In 1998 Saddam was making weapons and everybody knew it, why didn't people listen then and take him out, no, Republicans thought that GB I had beat him up enough and he no longer posed a threat, and Better flowers than 3.5 trillion on a wasted war....

2007-12-13 08:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by Akissyha B 2 · 1 0

Damn! I swore I wasn't going to respond to this kind of empty-headed drivel, because it makes me uncharitable, and I hate being uncharitable! Oh, what the hell...

No, Ron...I'm afraid you've got it wrong. Taxes need to be raised because that blithering simpleton twiddling his thumbs in the White House from YOUR party, along with his apologists in the Congress, has run up a half-trillion dollar tab (and counting, with no cash on hand and no end in sight) waging a pointless war that he lied to get us into and now can't get us out of. Do the math!

By the way, Nancy Pelosi's similar comments about the war make her as wrong in her thinking as your idiot president is in his. She should have done her homework. More importantly, she is old enough to understand that you can't count on the truthfulness of statements uttered by a moron.

2007-12-13 06:49:36 · answer #3 · answered by JMH 4 · 1 1

Bush spent 477 billion on a fake war. While that 16k may have helped somewhere else in the budget, 477 billion would have dramatically improved America.

But you don't care about that because you're for soldiers dying needlessly, right?

2007-12-13 06:33:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Well it takes allot of flowers for all the troops that have been killed by this Republican occupation escalation of Iraq.

2007-12-13 06:34:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Dictator Dumbya spent a TRILLION on his BIG LIE IRAQI CRUSADE. It's all on the credit card and much of it is being stolen by his cronies.

2007-12-13 06:32:58 · answer #6 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers