2007-12-13 04:56:09 · 13 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your president has never let you down.
Do you realize how it makes you look that you believe everything that dumb box in front of you tells you? Seriously, don't you ever consider checking the facts of anything you're told?
Comparing Hillary and Bush is a joke. They have nothing in common.
2007-12-13 05:00:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Probably whoever tries to shoot her first. I don't mean this as flippant, but honestly the angry white males around here tend to take this stuff pretty personally - and will feel threatened by her. Since the worst of the AWM's are fear biters, I honestly worry about her safety - even though I'd rather see her lose the primary. Barack has his own issues that way, don't forget, although I'd feel worse for the U.S. if he were assassinated than if Hillary were - say, if they were both elected, due to his less political affiliation. I dunno - this is all morbid, but look at it this way: we are being terrorized by a group of people whose culture is dying - just like the white male dominated United States culture. Look what they do, and look at what the Klan did. There are many similarities - so we need to tread cautiously.
2007-12-13 19:12:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is on the same side as Bush, just tries not to appear that way. Its called stacking the deck.
2007-12-13 13:14:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the Zionist central bankers "elect" our Presidents, I would not be surprised if Hillary is "elected". She is a proven Zionist that is working for the global agenda of one-world communism. You are correct. She and Bush are two peas of the same pod.
2007-12-13 13:06:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would be surprised. Surely there aren't enough people to believe her promises. Bush for example. Does the democrats want to make the same mistake just to "Show the Republicans"?
2007-12-13 14:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
*I agree Clinton is untrustworthy. So that alone will stop her from being elected.
Mr. Bush was elected twice because the American people thought he was more trustworthly than Algore or Swift boat Kerry.
2007-12-13 13:08:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It may come down to who the Republicans nominate and how the capaign unfolds. 2008 may be (as many elections are) the voters settling for the lesser of two evils.
2007-12-13 13:04:58 · answer #7 · answered by nileslad 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
-not me; but then again, I don't think Hillary is as untrustworthy as Bush.
2007-12-13 12:58:59 · answer #8 · answered by Shilo 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would not be the least bit surprised, in fact I am bracing for it.
2007-12-13 13:47:33 · answer #9 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not me, this is a dual-monarchy. I think they are already painting her presidential portrait.
2007-12-13 12:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋