2007-12-13 03:10:34 · 40 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hell YEAH!
2007-12-13 03:12:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 8⤋
i might fairly vote for Gore. He ought to have gained in 2000. We owe him a term in place of work. besides, he's an extremely eloquent speaker and he will in all probability do extra for the ecosystem in 8 weeks than Bush could have carried out in his entire 8 years. yet individually i think of the Democrats ought to run Barak Obama. He'd be a great president!
2016-11-03 03:25:39 · answer #2 · answered by dudderar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not!!!! Didn't the first time and wouldn't this time. He's even more wishy-washy than he was before. He can't tell the truth if his life depended on it. He's jumped on the whole global warming myth like a bunch of other nuts have throughout the past 50 years. (and yes I watched his stupid movie that he made....there were so many holes in his presentation...it wasn't even funny)
He's a whiner. How many men in the history of this country have lost elections? How many whined so much? No one stole his election. He lost like so many before him because of the way the electoral college system works. It has happened before and no one cared. Only when it was a Democrat did it matter. And even if we went back and wiped out the electoral college results...Bush still won the popular vote. That is a fact!!!
Did you know that as vice president he convinced congress to authorize the sell of ALL the reserve oil the Navy had. Who do you suppose they sold it to? Yep...Al Gores company. He made millions.
With all his talk of global warming and being responsible citizens of the world....he owns more than one home of monstrous proportions with guest homes on the estate to house all his secret service agents. He flies in a private jet...to good for public transportation. He drives around in limos...no Yugo for him. He travels all over the world wasting tons of jet fuel to promote his idiotic movie...why not satellite hook-up...wouldn't that be the environmental thing to do.
Then you can go onto the ties he has with the Saudi family...the same family he criticizes Bush for dealing with.
Or the millions his companies have made off of Haliburton...the same company he's criticized Bush and Cheney for using.
His voting record while in office was so flip flop it's obvious to anyone that can read he has no conviction other than to go with the winds of polls.
He's a hypocrite. He's spineless. He's wishy-washy. He is condescending. He's a liar.
Anyone that would vote for that fool doesn't read, doesn't look at his voting record, hasn't checked his background, doesn't look at his lifestyle, and hasn't paid any attention to his fickle reaction to polls since the beginning of his career.
2007-12-13 03:25:17 · answer #3 · answered by Bubbles 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, he already lost before and dragged the legal system into the process. America became a joke in the world during that time 'What- your American? You can't even choose a president!'.
How do I know? I was traveling overseas.
And what's this about being fixed? Sure, I agree with you the system is broken and we need to get rid of the Electoral College system and go with the populist vote, but that will never happen because it would make it harder for campaigning. Stupid politicians...stop pandering to a block of voters and instead reach out to ALL Americans.
2007-12-13 03:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by California Boy 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sure. He'd be a better leader than any current Republican candidate.
Think about this: If 1% of Florida voters had voted for Gore instead of Nader, Gore would have won in 2000 (provided the inaccurate vote count had remained the same).
2007-12-13 03:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Wow, Darth Vader asking about fixed elections. You ever look into how your boss got "elected?" No offense, second in rule of the Empire is good work if you can get it.
Anyways, yes I would vote for Al. But I think he realizes that he can get much more accomplished as an independent citizen without the constraints of the political system.
2007-12-13 03:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by Matthew D 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
How about we don't have an election this time. Being as he had the most votes last time maybe the supreme court could just appoint him. They did it for W and he did not win any thing so it would only be FAIR!!!
2007-12-13 03:19:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Funny that elections get fixed only in Democratic precincts
2007-12-13 03:22:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I cant think of a worse person to be President than Gore.
He would completly shut down our industrial companies because he thinks they are too dirty.
You want to drive a car? Better be some over priced hybrid that will never pay for the huge increase over a gas or diesel engine.
Then we have him riding around in his own jet and living in several homes that use more power in a month than a normal person would use in a year.
2007-12-13 03:15:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I wouldn't vote for Al Gore even if he could shoot lasers from his eyes and thunderbolts from his a**. The man is completely unhinged and so full of himself. He will still be worried about the seals drowning when Islam is blowing up the cities of the world.
2007-12-13 03:15:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Well for me it would depend on what he would try to do as president. I don't pick a person b/c there part of a party I pick them on what they want to do as president.
2007-12-13 03:15:52 · answer #11 · answered by missgigglebunny 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋