2007-12-13 03:04:51 · 17 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely. I hope they bury him in them. Obviously the prize means very little if I can run around campaigning an old idea and receive one.
2007-12-13 03:08:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, Al Gore has recieved his bit of publicity for that already. Gore should also practice what he preaches and find a more effective way to heat and power his in a more efficient manner if he doesn't want to be viewed as a pontificating hypocrite.
I know Vader will find my lack of faith disturbing(he can bend spoons with his Jedi Mind trick as far as I'm concerned)
A.C.
2007-12-13 03:20:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, Al Gore shouldn't have received his initial Nobel Prize.
2007-12-13 03:08:04 · answer #3 · answered by Flavor Vortex 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Gore should definitely get a big prize for doing better than Fifth Avenue for selling what ever it is that he's selling.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-12-13 21:51:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gore needs to realize that as long as living creatures are breathing out CO2, there will be warming.
2007-12-13 04:32:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. One shouldnt' receive the Nobel prize for marketing your own product.
Lets face it, Al Gore's income comes from the carbon offset company he is CEO and majority stockholder of.
An Inconvenient truth is merely an advertisement.
2007-12-13 03:07:02 · answer #6 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
that's is not the only thing he did; to speak out and narrate that movie umm the Inconvenient truth.
He has done a lot of things prior and after that movie, he is really concerned about the environment.
JUST GIVE HIM THE NOBEL DAMNIT~!!
DONT HATE, APPRECIATE~!
those critics are just jealous.
2007-12-13 03:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by A. Roman 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Sure, since he donated the money to charity, he could use another payday, so lets put him on the short list for next time.
2007-12-13 03:08:19 · answer #8 · answered by Happy-go-Lucky 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
no just for speaking about a subject, If i'm not mistaken i thought this award was for advances in fields that help the peace process, which none of his liberal crap did, he shouldn't have got the first one.
2007-12-13 03:09:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It wasn't just him who received it, but a number of scientists devoted to this issue who receive no fame or recognition for it.
2007-12-13 03:08:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋