I have always preferred "Actor."
I'm not sure why, but there just seems to be a connotation that "actor" just sounds more serious.
There are only a few careers it seems that have different titles for males and females. There aren't doctors and doctresses. You don't earn your mistress degree in college.
I don't mind "actress," though - particularly in distinguishing a female performer as opposed to a male (such as for awards.) And even being called an actress can have a subtle regal and dramatic flair that "actor" just doesn't have.
But in general, I prefer the term "actor" - which makes me think of someone who is trained, working, honing their skills, and is taking their craft seriously.
2007-12-13 04:56:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by clawofiron 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actress seems still to be in use in Hollywood (possibly because of the Academy Awards), but for stage acting, the word actor seems to be used for both now.
2007-12-13 12:59:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actor for both men and women. An actress suggests a bimbo waitress who takes acting lessons,
2007-12-13 10:23:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by hfrankmann 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I generally say actor for both. I don't like femanizing in general but that's just me. An actor is an actor.
Marianne
2007-12-13 15:21:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Marianne D 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actor
I once broached to me female acting friends that the Oscars should be best actor, non-gender and they opposed that concept.
2007-12-13 11:13:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer 'actor'.
2007-12-13 11:12:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I prefer actress.
2007-12-13 10:24:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by samurai_fairy 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
It has to be Actor now as LAMDA passed this "law" as such. This is so we can no longer discriminate women.
2007-12-13 12:00:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋