Ooh! Sharp! Recognised muscle car! Hot!
2007-12-13 01:59:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i myself do not care touching directly to the kind of the automobile. What mattered to me became that KITT look good. It would not. It looks boxy and dorky, like some youngster went to the custom save and purchased each cheesy upload-on aside from wheel spinners. He concept it would make the automobile look good. The fluff in simple terms makes the automobile look like the owner is attempting too not uncomplicated. not encouraging. Knight Rider became by no signifies that great of a coach, yet KITT became continuously the main important merchandising factor. i'm fairly not bought in this version.
2016-11-03 03:17:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reboot syndrome. Same reason they changed Bumblebee to a Camero from a humble VW Beetle in Transformers.
2007-12-13 01:58:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pontiac , I belive is no longer making the Trans-Am. Beside Ford probably paid lots of moola for this.
2007-12-13 02:00:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by WC 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Say it ain't so. I bought a 1982 Trans-Am when I got out of high school because it looked like KITT.
Plus, I was hoping to hear William Daniels say "Scott, watch out!"
2007-12-13 01:58:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow, it looks great, but they should have stayed with a Trans Am.
2007-12-13 01:58:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ford probably offered the most money.
2007-12-13 01:58:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's blasphemy and sacrilege to the original black TA.
Phurface
2007-12-13 01:58:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Phurface 6
·
1⤊
0⤋