English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

yes i wish Hillary would have run instead of gore so that you would have had 4 terms of Clinton just like world war 2 we had FDR who pulled us out of the stock market crash caused by a conservative president and a great recession [depression] that followed!,. so then we would have world war 3 where we would have had a draft and war bonds and rationing just like FDR did then! and we would have it end by 2005 just like FDR ended world war 2 by 1945!

2007-12-14 10:56:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Bush and Republicans have agreed to the following, and the policies below have resulted in the biggest illegal transfer of wealth this country has ever seen as well as erosion of the constitution. Thanks alot.

1. Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary Clinton

2. Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's Daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him, and a bad guy when Bush needed a "we can't find Bin Laden" diversion.
3. Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is Communist, but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.
4. The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions against Iraq.
5. A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but multinational drug corporations can make decisions affecting all
mankind without regulation.
6. The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches, while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay.
7. If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have sex.
8. A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our longtime allies, then demand their cooperation and money.
9. Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy, but providing health care to all Americans is socialism. HMO's and insurance companies have the best interests of the public at heart.
10. Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but creationism should be taught in schools.
11. A president lying about an extramarital affair is an impeachable offense, but a president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.
12. Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet.
13. The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades, but George Bush's driving record is none of our business.
14. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery.

15. Supporting "Executive Privilege" for every Republican ever born, who will be born or who might be born (in perpetuity.
16. What Bill Clinton did in the 1960's is of vital national interest, but what Bush did in the '80's is irrelevant.

2007-12-13 09:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by MrNeutral 6 · 1 1

Of course it would. I mean, his countless decisions have cost some serious face with different countries such as France and Britian. Countries around the world see our wreckless spending as a reflection of our stupidity, basing their judgments off of our administration. I cannot say that 9/11 would not have happened because I don't know if that's true--I think his not taking it seriously caused alot more damage than it should've. I think that we most likely *coughdefinatelycough* would have not invaded Iran--that whole thing was some vendeta to his father. I'm sure some things would've happened anyway, but him as a representative for the country--the face of the nation--has really knocked us off of our pedastal in my eyes.

2007-12-13 08:59:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Which one? Sr. puked on the Japenese seniter and Jr. doomed a third of the population in Iraq... Long story short I think the world would be s afer place without either Bush

2007-12-13 08:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by Cole R 1 · 0 1

Yep
For better or worse who knows.

We still would have 9/11 how we handle it with someone like Gore I don't know and nobody really does.

Playing what if games in history are fun yet they shouldn't be taken too seriously because the future is big question mark.

Predication are mostly wrong.

2007-12-13 08:30:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No. The head billionaires in charge would have just put someone else in office to carry out their agenda. Bush and Kerry were both members of the Zionist secret society known as Skull and Bones. If something had happened to Bush, Kerry would have carried out the agenda the same way.

2007-12-13 08:07:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Actually, not really. I think Gore would have followed much of the same foreign policy as Democrats invariably want to prove they're not the dreaded bleeding heart liberal. Remember, the Clinton administration seriously contemplated an invasion of Iraq and much of the same planning was carried over by the Bush administration.

2007-12-13 07:59:34 · answer #7 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 6 3

Yes, but hindsight is 20/20.

Edit: loyal-What was Saddam going to take over the US with? Phantom WMDs.

2007-12-13 09:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 0 1

I think if Gore was elected people would have more faith in the electoral system (being that he got more votes). However, who would you give the Nobel Prize to? The inconvenient truth of the matter is Gore/Bush would be just as bad in different ways. Vote Ron Paul.

2007-12-13 08:03:53 · answer #9 · answered by brandon r 3 · 0 4

yes, the war probably would've been fought on the United States mainland; cities in such disarray, crime rampant, refugees/homeless (not just from natural disasters), gas prices...well, $3.00/gal would seem like a bargain.

2007-12-13 08:44:08 · answer #10 · answered by AILENE 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers