wWould Bush have invaded Iraq the way he did if they had the same Nuclear strenght that the US posses?

Question

I have posed a similar question before.
Lets say there were conclusive proof that Saddam had Nukes that would make Dubya blush.

Answer 1

Of course not! Logically, North Korea was a much greater threat to us than Iraq, but they have a powerful military, so we didn't attack them. Saddam's army was weak and disorganized, which is why he was willing to attack them.

Answer 2

no. he is afraid to attack North Korea because Kim has a little nuke, what more if Saddam had the same nuclear strength as the US. I think he invaded Iraq because he knew Saddam didn't have any nuke!

Answer 3

No, Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction, but America has the grandest of all WMD'S , we have Bush, he is the destroyer of the constitution, the bill of rights, our sovereignty, one day Bush's name will be the worst and dreaded of all cuss words..

Answer 4

Of course not. As the guy would have used them, even as big an idiot as George is he would not have (military would have told him to pound sand) used the same plan. Your going to mass your troops on his border and he's just going to sit there till you attack. No, he's just going to take them out.

Answer 5

The Liberation of Iraq would have proceeded with the necessary adjustments to military tactics, as needed

Answer 6

Iraq would have if Israel had not bombed them. Yes we would have still gone in.

Answer 7

Yes.

Answer 8

I think not to be honest..but can't predict when a rectum is going to pass gas,if you know what I mean !

Answer 9

No. that would be a bad idea.

Answer 10

No. In no uncertain terms, no.