2007-12-12 20:29:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Right, sorry.
I mean the deceider G.W.B.
2007-12-12 20:37:10 · update #1
" Decider" is a non existent term used by the beloved war monger.
No wonder so many people voted for him they've never listened to a word he's said!
2007-12-13 16:23:21 · update #2
Venom is a stupid beotch...that is all
2007-12-12 21:32:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
given what the DUMB-ocrats offered, Bush was an excellent choice. JFK (John Forbes Kerry) may just have surrendered after 9/11, because our military was "evil" according to him. As for AL BORE, well, he won the popular vote in 2000, but that just proves our system works well, and W was the better choice anyway. We have NOT been attacked on our soil since 9/11 (over 6 years) and any number of plots have been foiled because W used the intelligence community CORRECTLY. If we had been successfully attacked again, all you LIBERALS out there would be blaming him for NOT doing his job. Now you blame him for not only DOING IT, but DOING IT WELL.
2007-12-13 04:25:45 · answer #2 · answered by Mike 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Leslie,
No I do not regret voting for George Bush. Good leaders do not make decisions based on popularity. They base their decisions on what is in the best interest of the country. History will tell.
BTW what is "deceider"
2007-12-12 21:12:10 · answer #3 · answered by Dave R 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope, in 2000 8 years of Clintonian idealism of selling secrets to the Chinese was enough, didn't need Gore doing more of that. In 2004, couldn't vote for a man who staged his own documentary in Viet Nam and then came home and called the brave men and women he served with murderers, cuthroats, and rapists.
2007-12-12 21:16:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No one on yahoo would vote would they? who did vote for that brain surgeon, what percentage of yanks vote, got me beat, how he's in charge of the most power full military force in the world.
2007-12-12 21:05:00 · answer #5 · answered by HAVIK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2007-12-12 23:01:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am proud to say I have never voted for or supported a bush. Never will. History has proven that as a family they are bad for America.
2007-12-12 20:45:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Never voted for him. Never considered him. Never will.
2000 - Gore
2004 - Nader
2007-12-12 21:06:34 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope, and would vote for him again if he could run a third term.
2007-12-12 21:21:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He has been a disappointment, but I think Al Gore and John Kerry would have been worse.
2007-12-13 01:08:05 · answer #10 · answered by mjmayer188 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
voted for both . Bush Sr. needs to run again that way my vote would help Americans even more
2007-12-12 20:42:45 · answer #11 · answered by bill 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋