Wanna is example of whining. Both examples are indicative of poor manners and upbringing and laziness.
2007-12-12 20:35:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sid B 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
These 2 words are non-standard grammar. You may express verbally but grammatically, it is not correct.
2007-12-12 20:33:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by nikki_G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer is NO.
wanna is just a single word (not really a word). Grammar is never never never never concerned with one word by itself.
That would be spelling, where you look at words one at a time. Not grammar.
2007-12-12 20:34:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Firebird 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hmmm. They're definitely non-standard, but I would consider them non-standard pronunciation rather than grammar. Or in written form, non-standard spelling. Dunno.
Ain't is non-standard grammar.
"I be thinking you be fine" is non-standard grammar.
2007-12-12 20:38:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Goddess of Grammar 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
these words are non-standard grammar also known as colloquial words.
2007-12-12 21:53:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by *~Sapphire~* 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it's an example of non-standard spelling to represent informal pronunciation.
(If anyone tells you they don't say wanna / gonna and dunno, listen carefully when they speak and you will find that almost everyone does.)
2007-12-13 04:42:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by vilgessuola 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You betcha boots.
2007-12-13 09:42:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. wan·na [wónnə]
want to (nonstandard)
2. dunno
don't know (nonstandard)
Yes. Wanna and dunno are examples of non-standard grammar.
2007-12-12 20:33:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kai Rocker 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yo!
2007-12-12 20:56:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋