English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bin Laden was a desgruntled employee of the U.S. or so the story goes. The U.S realises what the Bin Laden threat could cause and rather keeps him on the payroll and uses him to slam into the WTC and wreak havoc across the world. The U.S now has reason to "fight" terror. Kind of like Good cop Bad Cop. It's just a theory, tell me what do you think....

2007-12-12 18:46:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Mhal - this is purely for pondering purposes. and oh yes, Bin did work for the U.S. or to break it down, call it what you like, he worked for the CIA. Yes, doing the dirty work for the CIA still constitutes working for them...

2007-12-12 19:20:13 · update #1

13 answers

Until all the questions are fully answered including the cia tapes recently destroyed, anything is possible.

2007-12-12 20:05:04 · answer #1 · answered by 2012 4 · 1 1

Don't you want your story to include facts of any kind? Or is this for entertainment purposes?

OBL's father owns much of the property around the Grand Mosque in Mecca. His father funded an expensive rennovation of the Grand Mosque, and along with it, he built new properties within view. Many of them include American businesses: McDonalds, Burger King, the Sheraton Hotel, Avis and Hertz, etc.

The reason why Muslims began hating us is because they were offended by American businesses in their holy city (a place where non-Muslims are stopped at the gates and can't enter the city).

That's it. That's what started all this. OBL's dad was an idiot.

OBL was in college in Jedda, Saudi Arabia until 1980, he then travelled to Afghanistan where he stayed for a long time. He then travelled to the Sudan, stayed a few years, got kicked out, and returned to Afghanistan.

He has never worked in or for the US.

****************
Whoever told you that OBL worked for the CIA lied to you. The closest anyone in the US ever came to a relationship with that turd was when the US was supporting various Afghan resistances against the USSR in the 80s. That doesn't mean OBL, it means the war lords. OBL was not an Afghan, and we would never have taken him seriously.

2007-12-12 19:11:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Many people have come up with this backwards logic to describe a 9/11 conspiracy.

Doing so only harms the 9/11 truth movement. Effort should be put into the suspicious events and the evidence of different parts of the story we didn't get, not in some kind of suspect / motive reasoning, which is purely speculation.

2007-12-12 18:55:24 · answer #3 · answered by Frank 6 · 1 3

The US government lacks the competence to pull something like that off.

Bin Laden was being supplied by the CIA back when the Soviets were trying to run Afghanistan but he stopped working for the US after the downfall of the Soviet Union.

2007-12-12 19:08:35 · answer #4 · answered by bestonnet_00 7 · 0 2

The year....2015. The question: 9/11 conspiracy-think about it. Why don't you get a life?

2007-12-12 18:51:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Take a look at this, you will be amazed and terrrified, all at the same time.

2007-12-12 19:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by batfood1 4 · 0 0

I pretty much consider all 9/11 conspiracy theories to be poppycock.

Could you test your theory?

2007-12-12 18:55:58 · answer #7 · answered by Logan 5 · 2 3

Michael Moore move over !

2007-12-12 18:54:11 · answer #8 · answered by klby 6 · 2 2

There was no conspiracy. Your "theory" belongs in the trash can, with other discarded lies

2007-12-12 19:13:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Good grief!!!! Will the conspiracy theorists ever wake up?

2007-12-12 18:56:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers