In Chief of the USA? So she was First Lady? Big Deal...I know many "First Ladies of Business" they wouldn't think twice about taking their husband's jobs.
Would she even be a Senator of NY had she not been First Lady?
Be honest with yourselves....
Now tell me what qualifies her to be the Leader of the Free World....Are you counting on Bill to guide her? What if he Dies?
2007-12-12 17:49:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Can I get a STAR?
2007-12-12 18:05:39 · update #1
Our current President was the Govenor of the great state of Texas! now drink your kool-aid.
2007-12-12 18:07:46 · update #2
You hit the nail on the head! There is NO reason she should have been a Senator, let alone run for President. She has gotten EVERYTHING by riding on Bill's popularity. The people I sadly know that are voting for her, have admitted it's because they want Bill back in the White House. That's not a reason. She has NO qualifications, she's not to be trusted, and she will sell out America.
2007-12-12 17:56:51 · answer #1 · answered by Glenn T 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Some think she actually ran it. It you look at this theory, it could make sense as she had "no idea" he was doing the attacks on different women, nor did she know about the "interns", but one would think a sane person would have taken precautions.
Then the fact that she was able to obtain secret documents on high ranking political opponents and did not have her husband do this would show she can work on her feet and knows how to abuse power.
Actually these two points agree enough to show she is not qualified. Although many say just watching and observing her husband is where she got the talent, but let's face it, if she had done this, then he would not have been able to do the evil things he did.
No she is not qualified (not saying some others are not) and I might add that the latest numbers on her "lobbyist" money is reaching over $700,000 and that is a feat that not even the "big boys' can meet. I have had several state that "they (senators)" all do that and accept the brides, i mean the lobbyist money. With that much cash coming in it shows she is well connected and informed, no matter how biased from her wealth carrying constituents.
Matter of fact it is irrational to consider any of this as any experience that would or could benefit the country.
2007-12-13 04:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The hate comes from those on both sides, do you ever read the comments on Bush or Cheney or really any Republican. Hilary has escalated the hate to her by ranting about a right wing conspiracy against Bill and her. There is no conspiracy when people opposed to her work to defeat her and her issues that is politics. Hillary and her proposal for universal health care was seen and still is by many to be a major budget buster for the Feds if undertaken so yes that proposal will generate a lot of opposition to her at a time when conservatives want ot reign in an out of control federal spending spree. Strength when it might have been staged since her future political career is tied to his legacy really is not strength. And the investigation did show things thats why some in the Adm ended up in jail and some still should like his National Security council who saw fit to steal govt documents in his pants during the 9-11 commission.
2016-05-23 08:23:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a big fan of either Clinton, and I agree with some of what you are saying. I don't think that being First Lady should count for very much. And of course she wouldn't have been elected Senator, had she not been first lady.
Still, she will have served eight years in the Senate, which is usually considered a respectable amount of experience.
2007-12-12 18:18:10 · answer #4 · answered by yutsnark 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
the following reasons are why people voting for her
Hillary was raised in a middle-class family in the middle of America. Hillary went on to become one of America's foremost advocates for children and families; an attorney twice voted one of the most influential in America; a First Lady of Arkansas who helped transform the schools; a bestselling author; a First Lady for America who helped transform that role, becoming a champion for health care and families at home and a champion of women's rights and human rights around the world. also, the fact that bill will be with her.
I am not saying I'm voting for her but she has as a good of a chance as the other candidates.
2007-12-12 18:46:05 · answer #5 · answered by hammy 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well, to be perfectly honest, I don't think being president of the United States takes any experience, it takes a ton of skill, and understanding how the system works is a plus, but being around for a billion years doesn't mean you would make a good president... If thats the case, your man really is Ron Paul with ungodly amount of terms in office. Experience is overrated....
2007-12-12 19:09:17 · answer #6 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
clinton machine just sold out USA with china and make slave labor be legal as long big bussiness happy and middle class gone nothing different with bush liberal, even obama tied with soros.
liberal need pill what clinton done for this country?he or she is lier and pervert founder H I B visa NAFTA AND OPEN BORDER UNFAIR TRADE thats why we have big deficits and many jobbs loss.
bush clinton just lobbies,they run by special interest and billary ex board executive walmart.
2007-12-12 18:05:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think it's funny that people are upset with President Bush, because they say he lied, and these same people will vote for Hillary Clinton, who doesn't know how to tell the truth about anything.
2007-12-12 18:01:55 · answer #8 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Funny - I was just wondering that about King George; good thing Darth Chaney is around to pull his strings (hope he doesn't die!).
What's the worst thing that would happen if Hillary did win? CONservatives might not be able to leave the bill for their outrageous spending to our grandchildren??
2007-12-12 18:07:11 · answer #9 · answered by Sim - plicimus 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hillary is a very intelligent and politically saavy woman. She has held her own in a political arena dominated by "good ole boys".
Your argument of comparison between a "business woman" and a "First lady" is ridiculous. Try reading up on The NEXT PRESIDENT, be well informed, then try constructing a more formidable question.
P.S. What in the name of all that is logical made Bush qualified as president? MRS. PRESIDENT CLINTON could run political rings around that jag-off!
2007-12-12 18:05:06 · answer #10 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋