Does every tyrant really need a good bogey man to blame and scare the people?

Question

into doing things and accepting things and going along with programs they never otherwise would dream of accepting?

and isn't true that given opportunities to eliminate the bogey man, the tyrant actually will drag his feet and let the bogey man get away and continue to operate and "make threats" because a live and active bogey man is much more valuable to the tyrant than a dead one or one that is in custody?

Answer 1

A tyrant will not survive if he has no supporters.

Answer 2

Your analogy is obviously an accusation against our president. Our real bogeyman is a mind set that refuses to see the threat.

That is what led to 9/11. We were warned over a period of decades. (embassies around the world, US soldiers based overseas, Oklahoma City and much more) How did we respond? We cut back on our military and turned our heads when the bodies of our soldiers were drug by horses through foreign cities.

Yes, a tyrant can use scare tactics to get to their goal. If you don't know the intent of the Islamic threat, you've got your head in the sand. We all want this to go away. Some want it to really go away; others want it to go away in their own minds. Unfortunately, our lives and our country will be changed in a manor neither of us would find livable unless this 'bogey man' is thoroughly thrashed. I wish it was just a tactic, it would have already been destroyed.

Answer 3

This is a common political ploy. It's used by tyrants, but also by more benign politicians. The usual response from supporters of these politicians is to perpetuate the bogeyman, the opposition of course says the bogeyman doesn't exist.

This technique probably goes back to the first group of cavemen who decided on a leader based on fear. It's not a moral method of governance, but historically it almost always works.

Answer 4

Yes, a tyrant needs to unite the people against a common enemy, (real or imagined), to deflect their attention away from what the tyrant is really doing.

Answer 5

certainly, GW isn't the blame initially, in spite of the certainty that with the help of choosing up the gauntlet the place his daddy left off, he did perpetuate it. His daddy, HW is particularly in charge for what's occurring. whilst President, HW invested a brilliant style of his company's fortune (as nicely as a extensive bite persons money) into secret economic business enterprise debts shared with the help of different contributors of OPEC, and shared additionally, with Osama Bin encumbered. those investments have been to regulate the worldwide's existence blood - its oil grant. basically before the invasion of Kuwait, the CIA had offered and knowledgeable Osama Bin encumbered so as that he could pass up against the Soviets in Afghanistan. yet with the help of the time Bin encumbered had prepared his military, the Soviets had given up on Afghanistan. enthusiastic approximately eager to flex the muscle mass of his new military, Bin encumbered presented to help Saudi Arabia push Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. alongside comes HW and springs to a decision that he's going to commit our troops to Kuwait to guard his own sources and the U. S. oil pursuits. The Saudis instructed Bin encumbered to take a hike. Insulted, he developed a grudge against GW and all individuals for this reason. The bombing of the inn in Yemen became the start of terrorism against the U. S. with the help of Osama Bin encumbered. We fought decrease back after which he fought decrease back till it grew to grow to be an all-out war. definite, there have been different acts of terrorism against the U. S. earlier that, such through fact the bombing in Lebanon in 1983. yet this wasn't related to Bin encumbered and the subsequent activities superior as much as 9-11. This resulted from the U. S. pushing their theory of a Utopian democracy contained in the midst of Lebanon's Civil war - the place it neither belonged nor became it welcomed.

Answer 6

In Stalin's case, it was himself.

Answer 7

Couldn't have said it better myself.