HILLARY for PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-12-12 17:50:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pie's_Guy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, she is to polarizing a figure. I read a poll taken where people were asked would they vote for her and would they not vote for her under any circumstances.
She had 40% that said they would vote for her, but it was almost the full 60% of the others that said not under any circumstances.
I had a friend in the Secret Service that was on her detail and Bill's for a long time. He said Bill was a used car salesman and she was a totalitarian *****.
Let's think about this. She claims in her book that she didn't know about the affair. That makes her stupid, because she knows he can't keep his zipper up or she is liar. In either case, I don't have any use for her.
You think George W. is crazy, let her get into office.
2007-12-12 18:37:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by wcowell2000 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
She's so sorry, that I know of some old school Democrats that don't even want to be around her, much less have the intentions of voting for her. Many of them wish she didn't even call herself a democrat. Ponder that!
FYI: I was told that by a retired Senator from GA-D.
Hillary thinks so much of the American people that she wants to give away our money to everyone South of the border, and our country.
She thinks more of our enemies than she does of our own people in the military. Needless to say, people who will vote for her have never served in our armed forces before, either.
As for the comment made by Mean Mr. Clean about Wal-Mart, it's true. I know of people who have been working there for over 20 years and still don't even make a measely $15 an hour. And some still don't even make $12.50 an hour. Wal-Mart is a lot like Hillary--just plain sorry!
2007-12-12 17:05:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, like so many Americans, you don't explain WHY you support Hillary.
Is it becasue she says things like "I support the working woman!"
but does that mean she will take my money by force and give it away to working woman?
does that mean that working woman will have greater protection under the law and thus ignore the notion of "equal" protection under the law.
I have not heard one shred of specific ideas from Hillary....
Not that I dislike her...mind you, for I certainly hate Mr. Bush.
Hillary sat on the board of Wal-Mart for 2 years and during her husbands administration, Wal-Mart became the nearly the biggest compnay on the planet and pays the employes the WORST wages. both are from Arkansas.
Oh...and her husbands first piece of legislation was NAFTA....whcih alowwed virtually no regulation on the importation of cheap chinese crap......basically a free pass for Wal-Mart to grow and exploit more workers.
Hillary has been bought just as all the others......that means she has a good chance of fooling the country and actually winning.
2007-12-12 16:59:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Election in 2008? curiously which you assume that she would be able to win the democrat nomination, as that is till now the final election between the dem nominee and the republican nominee. The instant concern now's no remember if Hillary will win the nomination, as her invitability has dwindled interior the final month because of the fact of Obama's surge interior the early states (Iowa, NH & SC). If the nomination is held immediately or if she would be able to shield her contemporary ballot standings via the caucus and conventional dates, she would be able to win the nomination because of the fact her national ballot is approximately 20 factors earlier to Obama. on the different hand, if her contemporary ballot standings in Iowa, NH and SC become worse extra advantageous and the deterioration is observed in different states in Feb 2008, she could lose the nomination to Obama. If Hillary is nominated, there is an extremely probability that she would be able to win the final election, because of the fact maximum american human beings have been polled to show that they are going to choose for a dem nominee than a republican nominee. those human beings seem to have been dissatisfied with the republican administration (Iraq war, financial gadget, and so on.) via the way, don't be misled via human beings asserting the Hillary is polarizing or disliked via human beings. a lot of those human beings asserting so are republicans or obama supporters. The republicans prefer obama, not hillary, to be nominated because of the fact obama is extra definitely beatable via the republican nominee. in accordance to diverse polls, Hillary continues to be the main enjoyed candidate via the dem voters. Obama is beatable because of the fact (a) question approximately his muslim upbringing and faith, (b) very own character flaws: eating and medicines in intense college, grimy and lazy at homestead in line along with his spouse, and so on.), (c) politically green with basically 2 years as a US senator, and (d) his declare for blackness whilst 0.5-white, and so on.
2016-11-03 02:41:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
not at the rate she is going. She need to stop looking at the American public as idiots. That "Obama wanting to be president when he was kinder garden" was just plain stupid!
When I was in kindergarten I wanted to be a pimp, what's the big deal. I am not one. At that age most kids wanted to be something. So why was she bring down are neck about this childish thing.
2007-12-12 17:05:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yeah probably I personally don't like her and would rather see the other guy get it, think he would do a better job, but thats just my opinion, plus I think we should just keep the man tradition president should be a man, just my opinion don't want to be sexiest or nothing, all though that does sound pretty sexiest.
2007-12-12 17:11:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Damn, that was a heckuva New Years Eve Party.
2007-12-12 16:57:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hopefully no, She is no where near qualified to be president.
2007-12-12 16:57:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
ew, what's wrong with you, you disgrace all democrats.
2007-12-12 16:57:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋