English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before anyone starts bashing GWB, let me just say that I believe he has screwed up Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Korea, Katrina etc.......But Hillary voted to authorize military action against Iraq then made every effort to undermine the war. I feel she changed her stance not because she thought the war was wrong, but because she wanted to score political points. In that aspect she was very succesful, but I feel that her actions have prolonged the war in Iraq. As a result our troops our paying the price in blood. Isn't that treason?

2007-12-12 16:41:33 · 25 answers · asked by Big J 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Bush and Cheney could be tried to, but my problem is that Hillary is running for President and that doesn't seem to bother a lot of people.

2007-12-12 16:49:25 · update #1

25 answers

I agree with your assessment of treason. I think Dennis Kucinich tops the list, though.

Fartpit...your name says it all.

Here is a little tip...dont believe everything you see on tv.

2007-12-12 16:44:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

First of all...the vote was to authorize Bush to use military force IF necessary and as a last resort. Invading Iraq was definitely not a last resort since we already had inspectors there. And Iraq was obviously not a threat.

Second....we are not at war. We are occupying Iraq. They have a government which we hold regular meetings with. Bush, Cheney, Rice routinely visit the country. Yes there is violence there....but we are not at war with Iraq.

Third....if pointing out that this war was a debacle and that it is time to bring the troops home is being a traitor....then well over half of everyone in America is a traitor. Not just Hillary.

2007-12-12 16:52:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hillary and many many others have sold this country out time after time.The stories are out there and i con t understand how all the dirt on these people gets covered up. We all know it to be trus and yet nothing is being done to sort out the traitors.Why is that? Cover ups,lies and control of the media have let corruption run amuck in washington.There are so many involved that it seems to be a impossible task to bring all these people to justice. We as a nation need to stand together and rid the country of these crooks befor we all go down. Even the implication of wrong doings should launch a full scale investigation into stories about crimes but it seems there is a cloak of protection around the criminal activities going on in government.So many stories that have come out tells me that not all of the acusations are false ,yet no one is brought to bare for these charges.The blanket of secratcy has been going for 20 years or more.The day will come that we all will pay a teribul price for doing nothing.When its far too late the truth will serface. Our government has sold out the american people for a long time.For the most part we only have ourselves to blame for remaining silent and letting it happen.

2016-09-04 06:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by ga_mountain_rider 2 · 0 0

Here's what happened with Hillary. She voted yea on that resolution because she believed, along with everyone else who did the same, that Bush would adhere to the standards set out in the resolution. He did not. He just ignored the requrements of getting U.N. approval and exhausting diplomacy. If that wasn't bad enough he sent our troops over there underequipped and had no plan whatsoever for the aftermath or any sort of exit plan. Also, it's become common knowledge that Bush and Cheney lied to all of us, including Congress, about the yellow cake uranium. Also, all of those who voted nay on that resolution didn't do so because they had some secret information the rest of them didn't.

When it became clear that Bush was mishandling the war and was showing signs of incompetence and deception about the purpose of this war, Hillary started coming out in force against it, demanding answers she never got in regard to questions about the tactics Bush was using and his war plan. When she voted yea on that resolution she believed the dangers that Bush & Co was selling to all of us. Is there some reason that Hillary should have known that he was lying when no one else but him and his minions knew it?

To tell you the truth I'm tired of beating this dead horse about who voted yea and nay on the war resolution. Most Americans know why those who voted yea did so, most agreed with them at the time, and they don't blame them now, they blame the person they should blame - George Bush. I want to know what they are going to do about the situation in Iraq and the Middle East NOW. Enough with the rehashing of the resolution vote, give me some answers about how you're going to handle the mess that Bush will leave when you're President. I like Hillary's stand on Iraq and the Middle East problem. It's realistic and it's most of the reason she's getting my vote.

If you dislike Hillary so much that anything she does must have a Machevallian (sp) bent to it, then you are biased. It's that simple. It's your right to feel any way you like about her of course. But going so far as to call her a traitor because she had the good character to trust her President, after which he let her and all of us down, is just ludicrous in my opinion.

2007-12-12 18:18:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

YES ! HILLARY CLINTON IS A TRAITOR
WE are all witnessing how our political correctness of the law in America works. Hillary Clinton action as Secretary of State (Handling Secret Material) violated her sworn duties in office. Her job title and activities in matters of security,defense and Top Level Data forbid her from using her Unsecured Private Email Servers and Communication Devises as the Top Level Official in SOS Department. However, she willfully abused her powers(rogue agent) that caused a clear action in Breach of Her Duty, Also, WE see The FBI Agency being controlled and showing its TRUE COLORS For The Elites and DOUBLE STANDARD OF JUSTICE IN AMERICA.

THEREFORE, there is an old saying, “One Crow does not pick-out another Crow Eyes”. She will never Eat-Crow with the Cabal Elites backing her for POTUS. Even if, she is unfit to hold any Office in Government. Thus, We the People, need to Petition the Common Law Grand Jury; Stop/Remove The Status Quo and Practice of Hillary Clinton For POTUS.

As an Army Military Soldier, Veteran Patriot and Christian I Love America. I took an Oath and Sworn Obligation to Protect and Defend America from all Enemy Foreign and Domestic to the best of my abilities. Hillary Clinton is an Enemy of The State and a Traitor to America Virtues. She most likely has Dual Citizenship in the State of Israel and her loyalty is to Israel. It is one thing to be an Allied and another thing to be a Traitor . JWS

2016-07-08 04:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by John Wayne S 1 · 0 0

Your proof of this is locked up tight in the Clinton Library in Arkansas ! How in the hell is Katrina President Bush`s fault ? The residents had a 3 day and more notice to get out of town , and they didn`t !!! It wasn`t Bush that let almost 300 city buses sit idle for days leading up to Katrina hitting ; and not be used to evacuate citizens , it was their stupid mayor of New Orleans , and the ignorant governor of Louisiana that sat on their hands during the warnings as the storm moved toward them , and when the crap hits the fan , they take no responsibility for their duty ; and point their finger at someone else ! Do you notice how is it that you will never hear the citizens in the mid-west that get hit by these massive ice storms with hardly any notice blaming anyone for their misfortune ?

2007-12-12 17:58:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

A traitor for voting for the war after being given bogus information? No. That blood is all on the hands of GWB. Should she have admitted making a mistake based on that doctored info? Yes, but that is hardly grounds for treason.

2007-12-12 16:49:35 · answer #7 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 3 2

Hillary voted to authorize force to enforce a UN resolution. This has been done. What we are doing there now has nothing whatsoever to do with WMDs.
She has not changed her stance no matter how Republicans try to misrepresent this and she has patently not committed treason.

2007-12-12 17:27:04 · answer #8 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1 1

Hillary let 4 men die, because she was afraid to go against Obama. It reminds me of a pimp that tells his ***** what to do and she dose it. Don t mean to insult bitches, but she is one step below them.

She does not care what happens to Americans as long as she get s $250.000 to tell America how much she love s them.

Hello Fools!

2015-06-08 15:48:31 · answer #9 · answered by john 1 · 1 0

O.K since you are so unhappy send OBAMA to IRAQ ,who cares anymore about politics it's all about money your word or mine does not matter Can't you see who ever has the most money will winn you will see stand at the voting door and watch!

2007-12-12 16:46:36 · answer #10 · answered by tina 2 · 1 0

Bush is an idiot. It is a shame a lot of people did not see that before they elected him. But what gets me no republican wants to admit that they picked a dud of a president. Many still support him. I think they don't want to admit this truth because it reflect so much on their poor judgment. Just like Rudy, he is a crook. He has became just like the mafia people he went after. He was using tax payer's money protect his girlfriend. And his judgment is just as worst as Bush's. He knew his friend was doing all sorts of things but he recommended him to be head of homeland security.

2007-12-12 17:16:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers