2007-12-12 15:11:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To one answerer here, I said "if he could run", I know he can't because he isn't a US citizen by birth.
2007-12-12 15:17:24 · update #1
No.
I have not seen anything that he has done in California that has made a significant impact on that state. Crime is still high. Energy consumption is still a problem. Immigration is still a big problem. The only thing that Arnold did was cash in at the right time. Things were bad during Gray Davis' tenure and couldn't get much worse. Arnold saw this and jumped on board.
2007-12-12 15:17:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well considering the last actor/Californian Governor/President fixed a big mess created by the preceding administration. Yes, in a heart beat. Reagan did a lot for this country. I think arnold could do the same if given a chance. Lets face the only good thing that came from Carter was Habitat for Humanity(and that wasn't even his idea in the first place).
2007-12-12 15:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope,
But it is funny, seeing some say reagan and thompson are celebrity buffons.
When both have more elected political experience than any of the current democratic party presidential candiates do.
I guess only in america, would someone considering being the wife of the president or being a state assembleyman,
To be more relavant experience than 8 years as california governor, or 15 years of political experience as an attorney working for the government and then being an elected senator.
2007-12-12 15:33:29 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i could be adamantly against this form of invoice even nonetheless i think of he'd be greater suitable than any of the three 'substantial' applicants for the duration of this actual election. i think of being a organic born citizen is a suitable and proper safety whether the occassional sterling danger is thereby neglected. as nicely, i think of we ought to bypass returned to the form, not far flung from it. subsequently I help Ron Paul.
2016-12-17 16:33:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Moot point, since the Constitution will never be amended to allow a non-native to be President.
Just like it will never be amended to eliminate the Electoral College.
2007-12-12 15:15:58 · answer #5 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for him but it won't happen unless they change the constitution to allow those who are foreign born to run for president.
2007-12-12 15:16:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He can't run for president (no, we're not in The Simpsons movie) and I wouldn't vote for him.
Doh!
2007-12-12 15:15:43 · answer #7 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If he was running against the Republicans that are now in the race, then yes.
2007-12-12 15:15:29 · answer #8 · answered by hansblix222 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's better than the current Republican candidates, in my opinion.
2007-12-12 15:18:39 · answer #9 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
He is a winner, smart and competent
2007-12-12 15:44:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋