2007-12-12 14:57:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He cannot relate to working families and has no sympathy for children.
2007-12-12 16:17:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a bunch of moonbats. Go read the bill. It was horrible. Democrats are known for sending bills that they know would be rejected. They don't even support free children healthcare. They just want to look like they do and that republicans don't. It's all trickery. The dumb bill wanted to give free healthcare to some children that already had private healthcare. Bush is not against children, but when all you stop your whining you'll realize you should be complaining to the parents for not providing for their own children. But what would you guys know, you're probably for people having children out of wedlock as well. Take care of your own families people. That is the American way, so be responsible and stop finger pointing that your lot in life is somehow everybodies problem other than yours.
2007-12-12 23:09:21 · answer #2 · answered by amber s 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
President Bush did the right thing. If the Democrats would clean up the Healthcare for Children proposal, I think he would not have vetoed it.
2007-12-12 23:44:50 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
The definition of stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
They sent him essentially the same bill, knowing he would veto it. This has nothing to do with helping children and everything to do with wanting a political issue.
2007-12-12 23:00:42 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 7⤊ 6⤋
I am quite disappointed in his actions about this, poor children need to have healthcare.
2007-12-12 23:01:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
No, he is just opposed to socialized medicine like most intelligent people. He's not your typical lemming who just wants more handouts from the government. I think the better question is why are you in favor of mandated government health care?
2007-12-12 23:12:17 · answer #6 · answered by - 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
No, he's not an animal. Animals have hearts and he doesn't. if he did, this war would be over, and the troops would be home. He's certainly not concerned about their health either.
2007-12-12 23:08:19 · answer #7 · answered by katydid 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Heathcare that included "children" up to age 25 with parent's making up to 80k a year. That's not healthcare, that socialised medicine wrapped in sheeps clothing.
2007-12-12 23:04:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 8⤋
Bush hates children - look at how F'd up his daughters are. Obviously victims of child abuse.
2007-12-12 23:02:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 5⤋
Are you that out of touch with reality? OR WHAT.
2007-12-12 23:09:14 · answer #10 · answered by NEOBillyfree 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋