Depends how you look at it.
2007-12-12 14:56:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mitch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The objective/subjective distinction is a bad one to make in the first place. It is just a bad metaphysical move we've continued to argue about since Plato's time. There is no sense in asking whether things are objective or subjective; there is no place where you can draw a sharp distinction between the two. Even when it comes to scientific facts, they are formed based upon our observations and judgements. These observations and judgements are influenced by our cultural community (the language we speak, the experiences we have, etc.). There is no place between observations and facts where we can point to and say, "Here is where the subjectivity stops and objectivity starts."
2007-12-12 19:07:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by dhizzle99 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
once you place it like that, "all of us see the same international do no longer we?" i could say no we don't, a minimum of in my opinion we don't. consistent with possibility the sole way that objectivity exists is that there is a novel undertaking we can seem at, a tree as an occasion, and we positioned our very own subjective emotions into it. i think of the international is what it relatively is and the human ideas only happens to reason ideals and a definite view of it. Subjective in my opinion is punctiliously human, yet objective is the object we seem at, a tree is usually a tree yet i will (and probable do) seem at it and sense in yet in any different case or observe countless issues approximately it then you definitely or somebody else
2016-12-11 03:06:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by giallombardo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see where you're coming from. Something that would seem so objective - what color something is, for example - can actually be subjective, when I say it's peach and you say it's pink and Joe calls it orange.
Would we all call a circle a circle? Perhaps math is a purely objective topic? But then there is always someone who will say that shapes and math don't really exist! So I guess, ultimately, everything is subjective.
:)
2007-12-12 15:05:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Meg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does objectivity exist, yes
Are humans capable of objectivity, no.
By definition, objectivity means without bias. No person on earth is capable of totally objectivity for the simple fact that each of us has a unique point of view. A person can be objectively subjective, but that is about as close as is possible in my opinion.
2007-12-12 15:34:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gee Whizdom™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe I'm objective and I even know when I'm being subjective. I don't know anyone who doesn't believe in reality - that doesn't make sense unless they're strung out on drugs. An opinion that's not shared doesn't render it subjective - subjective only means there's a bias involved.
2007-12-12 15:03:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Objectivity is a construct that trys to quantitiatively measure reality, but we are stuck with an imperfect body which receive information through imperfect senses. So even subjectivity is not valid. All we're left with is a filter through which we see the world. I think :-)
2007-12-12 17:54:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by hmmmm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great insightful question!!
The detached mind has the capability to be objective...... however, we can never be completely detached with respect to anything we consider real..... therefore we can be purely objective only with respect to something we believe to be absolutely unreal.... in other words, one may indeed conclude that pure objectivity is unreal or does not exist in reality.
2007-12-12 15:05:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you test your opinions, either against empiricist reality or in logical arguments, you discover if they are unfounded or not. Doing this makes you objective, or as objective as is possible. Opining without recourse to evidence is just chatter.
2007-12-12 15:43:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
in some areas of more complex philosophy you sometimes reach conclusions which you can never know if they are objective.... i mean it just goes all crazy
i dont think its hard.... its Impossibe for us to even imagine what objective is.
maybe if we develop math more or something but till then we are stuck with subjective thinking... don worry that is what helps you survive
2007-12-12 15:45:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by - 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, i believe that SOME scientist can be completely objective
like mr fantastic and dr doom
but its a hard thing to do, and alot of filters must be put in place
which is what the education system is for and really the one of the only field it truly benefits, but don't get me started
2007-12-12 15:51:39
·
answer #11
·
answered by And i heard as it were a thunder 6
·
0⤊
0⤋