English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

2007-12-12 14:12:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

I saw that too. Eat me hillary is using articles that can be easily manipulated. What he doesn't realize is this:

If no terrorists kill any US Troops during that time, then WHY DID BUSH INVADE THEM? Wasn't he the one who stated they had TERRORISTS? If there were no terrorists, what was the REAL purpose of the invasion?

2007-12-12 14:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 1 0

Terrorists kill civilians without warning and where success is nearly guaranteed by the element of surprise and the total lack of opposition.

When Al Qaida and the Taliban take up arms to kill soldiers, they are no longer terrorists, they are enemy combattants! They are also mostly dead!

2007-12-12 14:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by Ed Harley 4 · 0 0

Interesting. I am against the Iraq invasion but wouldn't have guessed this. Do we have stats that show how many terrorist the US has killed and captured.
Why do people argue against something and not show a source. It just sounds like an opinion and not a fact.

2007-12-12 14:41:21 · answer #3 · answered by Just my opinion 5 · 0 1

Liberals would like to think that, but not true. We are the bad guys. When will liberals stop supporting terrorists and start supporting the US of A!

2007-12-12 14:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You'd like that! How nuts! Only half witts will listen to you. Do you think it was uniformed Government troops that killed and kill our soldiers? NO it's stinkin sneaky tongue wagging yodelling terrorists hoping to go to their happy hoopla marter land! Terrorists all!

2007-12-12 14:17:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes. The deaths in Iraq are considered hostile combat deaths, not terrorist attacks. The study you cited, which was published by congress, used the military's own numbers.

See source below.

2007-12-12 14:16:43 · answer #6 · answered by eat me hillary 2 · 1 2

It's true, they are not terrorist, people defending their homeland from an aggressor.

2007-12-12 14:27:21 · answer #7 · answered by iceman 7 · 1 2

If I were a lib I would believe it. Thank God I'm not!

2007-12-12 14:15:58 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1 2

No. Would you?

2007-12-12 14:36:23 · answer #9 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers