seeing as the "chickenhawk" opposes his enemies, while the chickendove submits to them.
if you even believe in these labels...
2007-12-12 13:43:00 · 9 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The people that carry a big stick yet walk softly.
As for neo-cons, they are simply walking mouths. They don't do anything besides stir up trouble all over the world and then beg the US military to protect them from the hornets nest they just disturbed. How a person can live life void of morals, honesty, and dignity I'll never understand.
2007-12-12 13:52:28 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The key to the term "chickenhawk" is the word chicken. The chickenhawk doesn't fight - he sends others to fight for him. He never is brave enough to put his own skin at risk, and at heart is a coward who enjoys looking tough.
The dove makes peace wherever it is possible to do so. Because the dove doesn't put himself out as a tough-guy, he loses nothing when he chooses peace over war. But even a dove will defend his nest if pushed ...
2007-12-12 21:54:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The smartcookie lives longer because s/he knows that understanding the oneness of humanity and all that implies, especially establishing justice, education, and prosperity for all humanity are the ingredients to sustainable and lasting peace everywhere.
The smart cookie builds the machinery, the infrastructure to stop the flood rather than pulling drowning victims out one at a time, though some can do that part.
2007-12-12 21:50:17 · answer #3 · answered by jaicee 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Faulty logic since there is no such thing as a "chickendove".
chicken (coward) + hawk ( war ) = chickenhawk (which is what bush, you and most of his supporters are - loudmouths that squawk about "supporting war" but refuse to go fight)
chicken (coward) + dove (peace) = nonsense, since nobody is afraid of peace.
2007-12-12 21:56:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chickenhawks rules this one.
2007-12-12 21:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's my opinion, but since you put it that way, the "Chickenhawk" would have the chickendove for breakfast.
2007-12-12 21:49:16 · answer #6 · answered by Bubba 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nurture over nature!!!
this elementary game changed as soon as a man started sharpening stones...... and counting chickens...... your enemy isn't an animal..... it's an idea... a spirit..... which side are you on..... Madness or reason
2007-12-12 22:00:51 · answer #7 · answered by tigittytigitty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your chances of being involved in a terrorist attack are the same if your either one. Very VERY unlikely!
2007-12-12 21:53:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you fight the terrorists you have a chance of living, if you don't you have no chance at all.
2007-12-12 21:53:27 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋